Don’t ever put Jesus and Harry Kane in the same sentence let alone compare them in any way shape or form. Harry Kane has more talent in his left toenail than Jesus.same as Jesus then but older, more injury prone and much more money.
Don’t ever put Jesus and Harry Kane in the same sentence let alone compare them in any way shape or form. Harry Kane has more talent in his left toenail than Jesus.same as Jesus then but older, more injury prone and much more money.
Mr. Wrong wants to shut down an argument by bringing down one of our most dedicated players by talking up one that isn’t. Oh I forgot — your new strategy is saying “it’s done” or a variation of that whenever people want to debate whether his signing would be a good move or not. Very insecure, to say the leastDon’t ever put Jesus and Harry Kane in the same sentence let alone compare them in any way shape or form. Harry Kane has more talent in his left toenail than Jesus.
It keeps cropping up " the last 3 games" That's all it is ffs.is that the reason he doesnt move and gets the lowest performance score in each game. How come others have played so much better. Perhaps footballs not for you if you cant see his limitations the last three games.
England started with 2 defensive midfielders and finished with 3. THe centre-forward struggles.is that the reason he doesnt move and gets the lowest performance score in each game. How come others have played so much better. Perhaps footballs not for you if you cant see his limitations the last three games.
If he had been outstanding and scored a three or four goals in those games, i guess you would be singing his praises from the roof tops. But that didnt happen did it? Its not just those games, i genuinely dont think his style would suit our game under Pep. He doesnt have the energy imo.It keeps cropping up " the last 3 games" That's all it is ffs.
You didn’t get the memo: you can’t say anything about his England performances “because Southgate” and whatever criticisms you have of him at Spurs is “because it’s Spurs”If he had been outstanding and scored a three or four goals in those games, i guess you would be singing his praises from the roof tops. But that didnt happen did it? Its not just those games, i genuinely dont think his style would suit our game under Pep. He doesnt have the energy imo.
I agree, I saw Kane come deep to try and get involved, but he doesnt run with the ball does he. Hes a very good target man that relies on good service. The service would be better at City but his work rate is still poor for a Pep team. Same as Lukaka who is also pretty static imo. If we had a chouce I would go for Harland or Mbappe.England started with 2 defensive midfielders and finished with 3. THe centre-forward struggles.
The players who perform best are those who can come deep and run with the ball.
Can we not just buy Son instead?We'd have to buy Son too as Kane is useless without him