Harry Kane

Not bothered about Kane resale value I’m more bothered about having another top striker who will be out for a month or two every season! If go for Kane we should go for Haaland next season as well!
 
I went thorough a spell of constantly going over on my ankle. Was sickening the pain and like Kane I used to turn them at virtual right ankles. It occurred over about three years and I used to have to be careful just walking. Feel for the lad. Seems a nice bloke as well.
 
worsleyweb said:
I went thorough a spell of constantly going over on my ankle. Was sickening the pain and like Kane I used to turn them at virtual right ankles. It occurred over about three years and I used to have to be careful just walking. Feel for the lad. Seems a nice bloke as well.
Click to expand...
Suffered from ankle injuries too when I was playing football, When it happened once just landed the wrong way, After that kept happening the pain is ridiculous.
 
If we don’t sign Kane, I predict at least five years of watching him knock goals in for a major rival. Don’t worry folks, I’ll be around to remind everyone of the stupidity of rooting for this to happen :)
 
hgblue said:
If we don’t sign Kane, I predict at least five years of watching him knock goals in for a major rival. Don’t worry folks, I’ll be around to remind everyone of the stupidity of rooting for this to happen :)
Click to expand...
I didn’t know we were the ones making the calls
 
hgblue said:
If we don’t sign Kane, I predict at least five years of watching him knock goals in for a major rival. Don’t worry folks, I’ll be around to remind everyone of the stupidity of rooting for this to happen :)
Click to expand...
Stupidity is getting all upset because he's not everyone's first choice.
He will score goals wherever he goes, good on him. Whilst he's scoring those goals we will still be the best team in the league picking up silverware season upon season because whoever we sign to replace Aguero will funnily enough also be scoring lots of goals.
 
hgblue said:
If we don’t sign Kane, I predict at least five years of watching him knock goals in for a major rival. Don’t worry folks, I’ll be around to remind everyone of the stupidity of rooting for this to happen :)
Click to expand...
He is now, but that rival isn’t winning more trophies than us, and I would bet wherever he goes, and whoever we get we will still win more trophies than the club he’s at, unless its us. I just don’t think it would be 5 years of him knocking them in 3 or 4 at most.
I trust the club do do what’s best for us as a team over a period of years whatever that is.
 
Pablo1 said:
Stupidity is getting all upset because he's not everyone's first choice.
He will score goals wherever he goes, good on him. Whilst he's scoring those goals we will still be the best team in the league picking up silverware season upon season because whoever we sign to replace Aguero will funnily enough also be scoring lots of goals.
Click to expand...
I’m not upset, I find the negative attitude to the prospect of signing Kane hilarious.
 
hgblue said:
I’m not upset, I find the negative attitude to the prospect of signing Kane hilarious.
Click to expand...
I can only speak for myself but I'm not negative when it comes to potentially signing him.
Like I posted on this thread a month ago, he's not my first choice but I wouldn't be unhappy if he came.
I doubt many of those who are averse to him coming here are basing it on ability, at least I'd hope not because he has it in spades.
I'd rather we went all in on Haaland but have no problem with anyone preferring Kane.
 
hgblue said:
I’m not upset, I find the negative attitude to the prospect of signing Kane hilarious.
Click to expand...
Agreed its like acting like spoilt brats
We need a proven striker regardless of wether he is a twat, a glass ankle player , or talks a bit funny it comes across as people just being spitefull.I for one am just hoping that we just sign a proven goalscorer and dont care if thats kane or haaland!.
 
Hes a great striker, but the club has to look at financial sustainability, and he will have very little resale value in three or four years. Hes also injury prone. Thats why a younger player is a better option imho.
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
Hes a great striker, but the club has to look at financial sustainability, and he will have very little resale value in three or four years. Hes also injury prone. Thats why a younger player is a better option imho.
Click to expand...

when do city ever look at a resale value when they buy a player to go in the first team!?
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
i would say quite often when you look at the average age of the players we buy.
Click to expand...
He has a point though. We rarely sell on unless a player wants out or the move hasn't worked out. I can't think of many we've signed who we have allowed to leave when we wanted to keep them.
Only Sane springs to mind in recent years.
 
Churchlawtonblue said:
i would say quite often when you look at the average age of the players we buy.
Click to expand...
Gus Cruz said:
When we don’t sign players over 25 often
Click to expand...
Is that due to resale value or longevity? How many of our regular first team players have we actually sold? Sane is the only one that really comes to mind since Pep has joined. We are not a selling club by any means.
 
racecar said:
Is that due to resale value or longevity? How many of our regular first team players have we actually sold? Sane is the only one that really comes to mind since Pep has joined. We are not a selling club by any means.
Click to expand...
Which is also why we won’t spend what Levy would want for Kane... probably
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top