Harry Kane

Just seen the poll lmfao. Kane is the best option out there for us, how is that so difficult to see
 
Gus Cruz said:
Well, if you want a copy of the email or a recording of the phone call, there probably won’t be, but the reports back then were several and very clear that we would have matched PSG’s valuation, and it wasn’t just us. PSG happened to be his choice that sunmer.
Click to expand...

There are always reports we are willing to pay whatever fee suits the quote.for anyone. I doubt there was real interest that summer at that price, and we were stocked. Your point still very much stands though, I agree one is good value, the other imo isn't. And the club typically only pay top money for top value.
 
Just thinking about how we have been set up this season without a recognized striker. Would we go for Kane or Haaland for that matter? I just get the impression that Pep prefers playing without a true number 9 because the front 3 are so interchangeable. Not saying that Kane or Haaland can't do this job but at £100m+ for either, I can't see it to be honest not to mention he is always injured. Quality player though and would flourish under Pep but still.
 
jimmy blue shoes said:
I can't understand anyone not wanting Harry Kane, or Jack Grealish for that matter. They would both be immense for us!
Click to expand...

It is not so much not wanting them (or Kane at least) as it is not at the expected/quoted price. And also, not beleiving it would happen at that price.
 
skillman said:
One thing I hope we don't do is put all our eggs in the Haaland 2022 basket and go this season without a number 9. Like we did in 2019/20 with the CB position.
Click to expand...

I would doubt that would happen.

Here is a hypothetical choice. Messi this year and Haaland next year (no striker this year), or Kane this year?
 
blkswn said:
We aren't charity FC but we also need a replacement for Aguero. Arrogance has proven bad for lots of clubs, and we have seen it all play out.
Click to expand...
It’s not our problem whether Kane wants to win trophies, he’s a Spurs player and will be until 2024
 
Coatigan said:
I would doubt that would happen.

Here is a hypothetical choice. Messi this year and Haaland next year (no striker this year), or Kane this year?
Click to expand...
I can see Messi on a free with a huge wage bill more than I can see Kane or Haaland.
 
handsofstone said:
I don't understand how Kane is "short term"

Comparatively to Haaland yea obviously but in general terms he isn't short term at all

Like we spent £60mil on Mahrez when he was 27 and he's one of the first names on the team sheet 3 years later and is at the top of his game

Barcelona signed Suarez at 27 and he's their 2nd record goalscorer of all time

Haaland is the long term option(and my prefered one), but that doesn't make Kane a short term one

Lewandowski (32), Benzema (33), Ronaldo (36), Suarez (34), Immobile (31) are all in the top 5 goal scorers in their respective leagues

We'd get a world class option for 4/5 years...nothing 'short term' about signing Kane
Click to expand...
Great post. Too many take fifa games literally and see players fall off a cliff at 30
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top