Harry Kane

Kane is not worth £150m, not at his age. We have to draw the line somewhere, and whilst it’s frustrating if we don’t get him I’m hoping the club can get Ronaldo instead, or another shorter term striker then go for Haaland next year.

Kane is probably worth more to Spurs as he’s their best player, so I can see why they set the fee so high. They don’t have to sell or lower their price, why would they?

But we desperately need a striker because no-one we currently have is a good enough finisher. We can’t rely on midfielders always getting 10-15 goals a season, we create so many chances we just need someone to put them away.

Ronaldo would be a smart signing, especially on a free or even about £25m. But not £150m for Kane, maybe if he was 23, 24, but I think City are right to walk away. And I say that as someone very very disappointed we won’t be signing him.
 
Yep anyone slating the owners board or management for not getting a player the other club didn't to sell are idiots not proper blues.
It’s life, you don’t always get what you want. People acting like spoilt brats about it is just pathetic.

Probably be the same people that if city bid 170 million for him and signed him would be slagging the club for spending that on one player.
 
Imagine turning down £150million for a 28 year old player, when you're just going to sell them next year for £60mil less.

Enjoy it spurs, try not to get knocked out of the European Conference league before even getting into it!

As for Kane, obviously didn't want the move enough to agitate properly. Enjoy your bed pal!

At least for another hour before kane's PR team brief again!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.