So it's not innocent until proven guilty any more? Innocent as long as he claims he is innocent? Or, innocent as long as he's a united player?
All of which from Dan Roan and his BBC cronies still ignores the central issue of whatever happened to provoke him, attacking anybody was just a stupid thing to do and is the reason he's in hot water. That, and thinking he could use his reputation and wealth to pay off police... Sorry he claims he didn't know were police at the time, so presumably he though he was paying off Greek citizens to drop a community investigation into his behaviour which just happened to be taking place in a big building with lots of uniformed people in, down do whom had put him into something resembling a jail cell? Or maybe he thought he'd been abducted by the same Albanian gangsters, who kindly let him call his lawyer?
Let alone the "what if" factor.. but as the BBC ignored that question with our FFP trial - what if city didn't actually do anything wrong? - so not surprising nobody there is asking the question of what if Maguire is actually making all this up to save his hide, as the court seem to have determined, and he did actually attack and then try to bribe Greek police? What if the Greek police and judicial system has well done it's job here?