blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 33,407
Pep obviously hasn't got the pool of expertise bluemoon has.What does Pep see in him then?
Pep obviously hasn't got the pool of expertise bluemoon has.What does Pep see in him then?
Pep obviously hasn't got the pool of expertise bluemoon has.
It's also fair to point ot some of those hadn't played for 4 weeks, Stones and Delph for months.Amazing isn’t it! One of if not the greatest managers of all time knows less than some guys on here? ;-) pretty much every England player was shit last night and although stones mistake was horrific I personally blame the midfield as at city our midfield create angles and easy passes for the defenders to put the ball into? Stones looked up, was getting pressed and had no instant options? Then in fairness he panicked and instead of giving it to Pickford to clear made a complete hash of the whole situation.
Amazing isn’t it! One of if not the greatest managers of all time knows less than some guys on here? ;-) pretty much every England player was shit last night and although stones mistake was horrific I personally blame the midfield as at city our midfield create angles and easy passes for the defenders to put the ball into? Stones looked up, was getting pressed and had no instant options? Then in fairness he panicked and instead of giving it to Pickford to clear made a complete hash of the whole situation.
He doesn't need to improve just give us more depth and something different. Improving fro 198 points isn't really a thing , having more depth to maintain it is. If we buy him it's because Pep thinks he have what we need. Doesn't mean he can't be wrong or it doesn't work, but he has done enough to be trusted and if I thought a player wasn't good enough and Pep did, I think I'd wait and see how he does because chances are he'll be right and I'll be wrong.Maguire isn't better than any defender we have so that in of itself is a reason to steer clear. He doesn't improve us in any way.
In this instance I think Talent trumps experience and Maguire isn’t good enough for this team. £90m ?? I wouldn’t pay £25m for him because he simply wouldn’t fitThe others not experienced at this level. I'd like to think Pep will accept the 4th centre half as one of the later 4 or 5, but I'm not certain.
He’d cost more for sure, but Koulibaly is worth that kind of money.
I think leadership, determination, strength, height and a threat at set pieces.
What the fuck do I know
I don't think we'll go anywhere near Napoli after last season and JorginhoHe’d cost £100m minimum but he’s easily top 5 in the world. A monster of a defender and excellent on the ball.
Koulibaly is definitely the best CB in the Italian League which is known for its defenders.
Maguire isn't better than any defender we have so that in of itself is a reason to steer clear. He doesn't improve us in any way.
The issue for me is who starts beside Laporte? Unless I'm missing something it's one of Stones, Maguire (if he comes here), or Otamendi (if he stays) and quite honestly I have serious questions about all three of them. Stones seems to go through months-long spells where his concentration and mentality completely flounders. Otamendi has a tendency towards recklessness, which I admit he's done better at the past two years, but also has positional errors that lead to him chasing down forwards from behind trying to make dangerous tackles that can lead to free kicks and penalties. Maguire... Well, maybe he's better than I fear, but I've never been extremely impressed with him.He doesn't need to improve just give us more depth and something different. Improving fro 198 points isn't really a thing , having more depth to maintain it is. If we buy him it's because Pep thinks he have what we need. Doesn't mean he can't be wrong or it doesn't work, but he has done enough to be trusted and if I thought a player wasn't good enough and Pep did, I think I'd wait and see how he does because chances are he'll be right and I'll be wrong.
The way I see it he will be a useful if unspectacular addition. I would see him as a replacement ultimately for Otto rather than Vinny. We may have to go to the market again in near future unless the likes of Garcia make a breakthrough. The fact is we are in the midst of a tricky CB transition and MaGuire may be the best option currently available.The issue for me is who starts beside Laporte? Unless I'm missing something it's one of Stones, Maguire (if he comes here), or Otamendi (if he stays) and quite honestly I have serious questions about all three of them. Stones seems to go through months-long spells where his concentration and mentality completely flounders. Otamendi has a tendency towards recklessness, which I admit he's done better at the past two years, but also has positional errors that lead to him chasing down forwards from behind trying to make dangerous tackles that can lead to free kicks and penalties. Maguire... Well, maybe he's better than I fear, but I've never been extremely impressed with him.
Depth is fine, but starting any of those three doesn't inspire confidence in me that we'll win the Champions League.