He is Risen...

Status
Not open for further replies.
shevtheblue said:
chestervegasblue said:
shevtheblue said:
Good points. I think even the biggest christian believer would find it hard to argue that with so many versions of the bible there wasnt some fuckery involved in them somewhere.

Good points indeed. Excellent questions.

Biblically speaking, salvation has always been a product of the content of a person's faith. Those who believed in God would be saved. Because Christ was present at creation (not an indication that I am a world was created 4000 years ago person), his death could pay for the sins of those who died before he was on earth. Jews couldn't have faith in a man who hasn't existed yet, but that doesn't mean that they couldn't be made righteous in the eyes of the Father by the son's sacrifice. They still had to choose to have faith in God.

On the sacrifice point, it's not how he died that was the point (although it did fulfil tonnes of prophecies, partic. Psalm 22), but the fact that he was obedient to death. If he was the son of God, Jesus had unlimited power at his disposal. He could have very easily avoided the cross, but he didn't.

On your "created with sin" point: We were created with sin, but with the opportunity to sin. It's actually a massive expression of love to give someone the opportunity not to love you back.

Why would he need to sacrifice himself in the way that he did? Because Jews knew that story. It actually makes sense of God asking Abraham to kill Isaac, but all along intending to use the lamb as a sacrifice.

Hope these help a little. Going to sleep now, but I'll check back here in the morning.
The born with sin bit i really dont understand. Do you mean man is not born with sin but the opportunity to sin? Therefore a newborn has no sin and if it dies then it would go to heaven?

There are two types of sin here: inherited "original" sin and intentional sin (sin that we freely choose to make.)

I know that two wrongs can't make a right, i.e. two people who are sinners can't create something without sin, hence inherited, original sin. However, there is obviously no way that we can be held responsible for inherited sin. I believe Christ died for all sin, including original sin. I believe every child that dies receives eternal life. There is obviously a point at which we become responsible for are own actions and therefore liable to to intentional sin, which has probably been debated in numerous other threads.

I'm reassured on this issue by what Jesus came to do and what he said. For one, I can't believe that the same God who sent his only son to die so that his people (everyone) could be saved would look for technicalities (i.e. not having a developed enough mind to know him) to keep people out of heaven.

Secondly, I love this bit from Mark 10:

13 People were bringing little children to Jesus for him to place his hands on them, but the disciples rebuked them. 14 When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. 15 Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.” 16 And he took the children in his arms, placed his hands on them and blessed them.
 
The older I get the more I feel religious indoctrination is a form of mental abuse.It may be well intentioned but it's abuse nonetheless imo.Cultists telling me to open my mind melt my head.IRONY?
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
tonea2003 said:
all this nonsense has a whiff of paul and johnny

Pauldominic in particular,and I suggested as much on page 9.
The irony of a religious person ruining an Easter thread,where even atheists wished those of faith an enjoyable weekend,with nasty and unprovoked threats of eternal hell for not believing should not be lost on anybody.
He even did his trademark trick of leaving the thread with a parting shot,only to return 15 minutes later with another half dozen posts of predictably pious vitriol.
Yet he is the one who has had more 'religion' threads pulled than anyone.
The priceless hypocrisy of the truly devout never fails to make me laugh.
Youre right, it does amaze how the truly devout will almost go out of their way to threaten people with hell fire while at the same time preach peace. Fuckin bonkers.


Ok so nobody has been able to answer my question re jesus dying on the cross. From a scientific point of view im sure there are people here who could say for sure, but i always thought that when a body is dead the blood will stop pumping therefore it would go to where gravity takes it. So if jesus was dead his blood would have gone down to his feet and when he got stabbed with the spear by the roman no blood would have come out? Also the blood thickens on death so it wouldnt have come out as described in the bible (something about blood coming out with water from the wound). Theres also an assumption that if he wasnt dead then he could have been killed by the spear but again there is a possibility he was alive when taken off the cross and then healed. Of course to a person from that time it would seem as if he had died and comeback to life.
 
Chris in London said:
shevtheblue said:
metalblue said:
Well if your sure mate...I'll book mark this post just in case I get to them pearly gates and Peter says you're not on the list...least I can show I had intended to but got sidetracked.
Haha. If peter is anything like the bouncers ive seen he will kick your head in for daring to speak.


Last summer we buried my father in law in his favourite city shirt, a pair of jeans and comfortable trainers.

I guess by that yardstick he's knackered?
And on the 6th day god created manchester city. Should be fine, as long as he didnt have any bottles of alcohol concealed in his socks to drink on the cheap when he gets inside :smile:
 
shevtheblue said:
Chris in London said:
shevtheblue said:
Haha. If peter is anything like the bouncers ive seen he will kick your head in for daring to speak.


Last summer we buried my father in law in his favourite city shirt, a pair of jeans and comfortable trainers.

I guess by that yardstick he's knackered?
And on the 6th day god created manchester city. Should be fine, as long as he didnt have any bottles of alcohol concealed in his socks to drink on the cheap when he gets inside :smile:

Or stood up and "Peter" had been outsourced to showtec
 
chestervegasblue said:
shevtheblue said:
chestervegasblue said:
Good points indeed. Excellent questions.

Biblically speaking, salvation has always been a product of the content of a person's faith. Those who believed in God would be saved. Because Christ was present at creation (not an indication that I am a world was created 4000 years ago person), his death could pay for the sins of those who died before he was on earth. Jews couldn't have faith in a man who hasn't existed yet, but that doesn't mean that they couldn't be made righteous in the eyes of the Father by the son's sacrifice. They still had to choose to have faith in God.

On the sacrifice point, it's not how he died that was the point (although it did fulfil tonnes of prophecies, partic. Psalm 22), but the fact that he was obedient to death. If he was the son of God, Jesus had unlimited power at his disposal. He could have very easily avoided the cross, but he didn't.

On your "created with sin" point: We were created with sin, but with the opportunity to sin. It's actually a massive expression of love to give someone the opportunity not to love you back.

Why would he need to sacrifice himself in the way that he did? Because Jews knew that story. It actually makes sense of God asking Abraham to kill Isaac, but all along intending to use the lamb as a sacrifice.

Hope these help a little. Going to sleep now, but I'll check back here in the morning.
The born with sin bit i really dont understand. Do you mean man is not born with sin but the opportunity to sin? Therefore a newborn has no sin and if it dies then it would go to heaven?

There are two types of sin here: inherited "original" sin and intentional sin (sin that we freely choose to make.)

I know that two wrongs can't make a right, i.e. two people who are sinners can't create something without sin, hence inherited, original sin. However, there is obviously no way that we can be held responsible for inherited sin. I believe Christ died for all sin, including original sin. I believe every child that dies receives eternal life. There is obviously a point at which we become responsible for are own actions and therefore liable to to intentional sin, which has probably been debated in numerous other threads.

I'm reassured on this issue by what Jesus came to do and what he said. For one, I can't believe that the same God who sent his only son to die so that his people (everyone) could be saved would look for technicalities (i.e. not having a developed enough mind to know him) to keep people out of heaven.

Secondly, I love this bit from Mark 10:

13 People were bringing little children to Jesus for him to place his hands on them, but the disciples rebuked them. 14 When Jesus saw this, he was indignant. He said to them, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. 15 Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.” 16 And he took the children in his arms, placed his hands on them and blessed them.
Thanks makes a bit more sense but i suppose its open to interpretation.
So how come we are not all seen as gods children? In christianity it seems like man belongs to jesus more than they do to god? Of god makes us all, the surely Jesus is not gods only son?
 
metalblue said:
shevtheblue said:
Chris in London said:
Last summer we buried my father in law in his favourite city shirt, a pair of jeans and comfortable trainers.

I guess by that yardstick he's knackered?
And on the 6th day god created manchester city. Should be fine, as long as he didnt have any bottles of alcohol concealed in his socks to drink on the cheap when he gets inside :smile:

Or stood up and "Peter" had been outsourced to showtec

Crafty fag in the bogs?

Purgatory?
 
Shadz69 said:
The older I get the more I feel religious indoctrination is a form of mental abuse.It may be well intentioned but it's abuse nonetheless imo.Cultists telling me to open my mind melt my head.IRONY?
To an extent it is. But there are some values to every religion that undeniably are missing in society today. Its just that the rest of the baggage just makes it seem pointless.
 
Chris in London said:
metalblue said:
shevtheblue said:
And on the 6th day god created manchester city. Should be fine, as long as he didnt have any bottles of alcohol concealed in his socks to drink on the cheap when he gets inside :smile:

Or stood up and "Peter" had been outsourced to showtec

Crafty fag in the bogs?

Purgatory?

If he was catholic...could have gone either way. Otherwise purgatory is a cert.
 
Chris in London said:
metalblue said:
shevtheblue said:
And on the 6th day god created manchester city. Should be fine, as long as he didnt have any bottles of alcohol concealed in his socks to drink on the cheap when he gets inside :smile:

Or stood up and "Peter" had been outsourced to showtec

Crafty fag in the bogs?

Purgatory?
Good point, what happens when petes asleep? Do you just wait in the reception listening to cliff richard on repeat?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.