Here we go ...

johnmc said:
pominoz said:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/153822-nasa-discovers-three-earth-sized-planets-right-in-the-habitable-zone" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1538 ... table-zone</a>

"Today, NASA announced a new milestone in Kepler’s survey of the heavens — the confirmation of Kepler 62e and 62f as existing planets within the habitable zone of their parent star, Kepler 62. These discoveries are remarkable; this is the first time we’ve confirmed planets roughly the same size as Earth orbiting in the Goldilocks Zone. Kepler 62e is 1.61x Earth’s size and orbits every 122 days, while Kepler 62f is 1.41x Earth-size and orbits every 267 days".

So 3 inhabitable planets yet how many lifeforms were also identified? Zero

Moving the goalposts, how unusual for "believers".

" As of the last update, Kepler has detected 2,740 planetary candidates across 2046 stars. If Hubble brought us visions of the cosmos from the dawn of creation, Kepler has been vital in our search for other planets in our own backyard."

Give it time, we are only just starting to look.

281ldd.jpg
 
So if technology keeps improving yet keeps fing inhabitable planets that arent inhabited you people will jsut say yes but we are only just starting and will cite a near infinite landscape
 
johnmc said:
The Flash said:
Moving the goalposts there, John.

The question was whether earth-like planets had been found in the habitable zone around other stars.

That was answered.

I mentioned intelligent life forms elsewhere of which there is as much evidence of as there is God.

Strawman.

No one has stated as fact that there intelligent life out there, it's just a theory. Whereas many claim as fact there is a God because a dusty book told them so.
 
johnmc said:
So if technology keeps improving yet keeps fing inhabitable planets that arent inhabited you people will jsut say yes but we are only just starting and will cite a near infinite landscape

You really believe we are on the only planet in the universe that has life?

In our Milky Way alone there an estimated 400 billion stars, there are probably 170 billion galaxies in the observable Universe, if our galaxy is "average, then there is 400 billion stars x 170 billion galaxies out there.
No chance that life could evolve on, say 5 on average planets, orbiting all those stars?
Really?
 
pominoz said:
johnmc said:
So if technology keeps improving yet keeps fing inhabitable planets that arent inhabited you people will jsut say yes but we are only just starting and will cite a near infinite landscape

You really believe we are on the only planet in the universe that has life?

In our Milky Way alone there an estimated 400 billion stars, there are probably 170 billion galaxies in the observable Universe, if our galaxy is "average, then there is 400 billion stars x 170 billion galaxies out there.
No chance that life could evolve on, say 5 on average planets, orbiting all those stars?
Really?
Not if god didn't want it there.
 
andyhinch said:
pominoz said:
johnmc said:
So if technology keeps improving yet keeps fing inhabitable planets that arent inhabited you people will jsut say yes but we are only just starting and will cite a near infinite landscape

You really believe we are on the only planet in the universe that has life?

In our Milky Way alone there an estimated 400 billion stars, there are probably 170 billion galaxies in the observable Universe, if our galaxy is "average, then there is 400 billion stars x 170 billion galaxies out there.
No chance that life could evolve on, say 5 on average planets, orbiting all those stars?
Really?
Not if god didn't want it there.

Not sure if serious.
 
pominoz said:
andyhinch said:
pominoz said:
You really believe we are on the only planet in the universe that has life?

In our Milky Way alone there an estimated 400 billion stars, there are probably 170 billion galaxies in the observable Universe, if our galaxy is "average, then there is 400 billion stars x 170 billion galaxies out there.
No chance that life could evolve on, say 5 on average planets, orbiting all those stars?
Really?
Not if god didn't want it there.

Not sure if serious.
If you believe, it's the only logical conclusion you can come to.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.