Homophobia

[Bluemoon115]

I guess my way of thinking is that life is all about pro-creation, and that doesn't fit into it.

Sex with a girl on the pill.

Protected vaginal intercourse.

Oral sex.

Anal sex.

Hand jobs.

Tit jobs.

Just rubbing it against a girl on the bus as you walk past her.

None of them geared towards procreation. All of them pretty good.

A male-female relationship is capable of procreation. A gay one isn't.

Just my view, I can accept others think differently (and that is fine) unlike some.

Not an argument unless that's all you use sex for.

Do you believe homosexuality is a choice?

Did you know it occurs in nearly all species?

Nature is unnatural eh?

 

[MCFC BOB]

.......there's still a seemingly non-lethal problem with attitudes towards homosexuality that I feel will go on until the 60's baby-boom generation has passed on.

Did you or did you not post this?

To be fair, that doesn't say the 60s baby-boom generation is responsible, just that attitudes towards homosexuality could take decades to become mild to the point of indifference.

I wouldn't worry, Squirty seems to have a problem with everything I say.

 

[Anonymous]

The love between a man and another man is very beautiful actually. It's only when they start touching each other's bottoms that it all gets a bit eeewww!

 

[squirtyflower]

.......there's still a seemingly non-lethal problem with attitudes towards homosexuality that I feel will go on until the 60's baby-boom generation has passed on.

Did you or did you not post this?

That's right. But it was more to do with the amount of time that will pass (30 years) rather than the people who are responsible for homophobia in this country. Although, now you mention it, I would argue that homophobia can be passed down through a family by the way of traditional values that a family maintains, and because baby-boom parents are of the age where homosexuality was considered a foreign and unusual concept (as well as traditional ideas of what love and marriage are), the confusion from these people could have been turned into homophobia and passed down to 60's children. However, I'm not suggesting that 60's children are solely responsible for homophobia in this country.

But again, nice try.

As I said you display the traits of the intolerant
The facts prove you wrong and instead of just saying 'fair cop I used an incorrect example', you become sarcastic, rather childish don't you think!

If you wished to say it would take another thirty years to get past current issues you should have said that, but you didn't, you labelled baby-boomers

Furthermore it's even more foolish to consider those born in the sixties ( they weren't baby boomers) as sexually repressed as they probably did more than any other generation to open sexuality to 'polite' society
Ps I'm not a baby-boomer

 

[TheMightyQuinn]

Sex with a girl on the pill.

Protected vaginal intercourse.

Oral sex.

Anal sex.

Hand jobs.

Tit jobs.

Just rubbing it against a girl on the bus as you walk past her.

None of them geared towards procreation. All of them pretty good.

A male-female relationship is capable of procreation. A gay one isn't.

Just my view, I can accept others think differently (and that is fine) unlike some.

Not an argument unless that's all you use sex for.

Do you believe homosexuality is a choice?

Did you know it occurs in nearly all species?

Nature is unnatural eh?

Spot on.

Unless you only have sex with a view to pregnancy, you participate in sex which isn't geared towards procreation.

Gayness is funny but it isn't unnatural.

 

[squirtyflower]

Did you or did you not post this?

To be fair, that doesn't say the 60s baby-boom generation is responsible, just that attitudes towards homosexuality could take decades to become mild to the point of indifference.

I wouldn't worry, Squirty seems to have a problem with everything I say.

Yet another generalisation, you have a great difficulty in helping yourself

You have a problem in being genuine

Like I said, when you're wrong it's acceptable to admit it but clearly you are never wrong

PS search your posts and find the last time I pulled you up on something
Shouldn't be too difficult as according to you 'Squirty has a problem with everything I say'.

Pps Squirty isn't capitalised

 

[MCFC BOB]

To be fair, that doesn't say the 60s baby-boom generation is responsible, just that attitudes towards homosexuality could take decades to become mild to the point of indifference.

I wouldn't worry, Squirty seems to have a problem with everything I say.

Yet another generalisation, you have a great difficulty in helping yourself

You have a problem in being genuine

Like I said, when you're wrong it's acceptable to admit it but clearly you are never wrong

PS search your posts and find the last time I pulled you up on something
Shouldn't be too difficult as according to you 'Squirty has a problem with everything I say'.

Pps Squirty isn't capitalised

"I've told you a million times: stop exaggerating!"

I've made suggestions in this thread regarding baby-boomers' attitudes to homosexuality and nothing more, but you've expertly twisted my words and made me look as if I'm intolerant towards people born in the 1960s.

 

[squirtyflower]

I wouldn't worry, Squirty seems to have a problem with everything I say.

Yet another generalisation, you have a great difficulty in helping yourself

You have a problem in being genuine

Like I said, when you're wrong it's acceptable to admit it but clearly you are never wrong

PS search your posts and find the last time I pulled you up on something
Shouldn't be too difficult as according to you 'Squirty has a problem with everything I say'.

Pps Squirty isn't capitalised

"I've told you a million times: stop exaggerating!"

I've made suggestions in this thread regarding baby-boomers' attitudes to homosexuality and nothing more, but you've expertly twisted my words and made me look as if I'm intolerant towards people born in the 1960s.

I'm sorry bob
I thought all I'd done was reproduce the words you posted, that's why I asked you did you post them earlier

 

[Bluemoon115]

A male-female relationship is capable of procreation. A gay one isn't.

Just my view, I can accept others think differently (and that is fine) unlike some.

Not an argument unless that's all you use sex for.

Do you believe homosexuality is a choice?

Did you know it occurs in nearly all species?

Nature is unnatural eh?

Spot on.

Unless you only have sex with a view to pregnancy, you participate in sex which isn't geared towards procreation.

Gayness is funny but it isn't unnatural.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Or2lSPtszo[/youtube]

Enjoy.

 

[MCFC BOB]

Yet another generalisation, you have a great difficulty in helping yourself

You have a problem in being genuine

Like I said, when you're wrong it's acceptable to admit it but clearly you are never wrong

PS search your posts and find the last time I pulled you up on something
Shouldn't be too difficult as according to you 'Squirty has a problem with everything I say'.

Pps Squirty isn't capitalised

"I've told you a million times: stop exaggerating!"

I've made suggestions in this thread regarding baby-boomers' attitudes to homosexuality and nothing more, but you've expertly twisted my words and made me look as if I'm intolerant towards people born in the 1960s.

I'm sorry bob
I thought all I'd done was reproduce the words you posted, that's why I asked you did you post them earlier

You twisted them, and you know you did.