Bilboblue
Well-Known Member
dan.j.mcfc said:franksinatra said:dan.j.mcfc said:This all day long........
I think somebody compared this to ali/tyson debate, absolute garbage!!!!
Iniesta/Silva yes, but Kinkladze/Silva not in a million years. Kinkladze was an average prem player at the very best, probably a decent championship player in all reality. Its absolutely mind boggling how some of you regard him so highly and are comparing him with Silva. I want what some of you lot are smoking, it might make work go about quicker.
Where has anyone said he is as good a player as Silva?
The players are compared because they both posess mesmering skills and the ability to produce flashes out of the brilliance, others players are not capable of.
Decent championship player...priceless
The title of the thread is "Honestly who is/was better?" maybe you should read before posting.
To ask who's better out of Silva and Kinkladze is as somebody else as already said, like asking who's better out of Goater and Aguero. Kinkladze left City to move onto bigger and better things at Ajax and managed just 12 appearances in 2 years without ever scoring and yet still some of you are comparing him to Silva, it really really is astonishing how deluded some people are about Kinkladze.
It's also astonishing how short your memory is.
Kinky was signed by the Ajax boss who was then sacked without Kinky ever having played for him.
The new bloke came in and decided Kinkladze was a left winger, and you wonder why he didn't do well there?
Kinkladze was a fucking brilliant player, even more so when you think of the shite he had to play with, Silva is a better player, but he wouldn't have been as good in THAT side as Gio was.
Oh, and Joe Royle was a **** for doing what he did to him.