I strongly suspect they made a few edits to an article which was already written and ready called "Sheikh Mansour could save football if he wanted", ie subtly blaming us for the whole thing. It reads that way to me.The daily mail literally ran an article last night saying “Sheikh Mansour saves football”
I suspect we will use press leaks to get our story out soon. Certainly they will mean a lot more than hollow statements. That one from Liverpool this morning makes things worse for them.Still puzzled because we have only had a terse statement on our website. I’d like to know why and what exactly they were thinking of but I guess that will never be explained.
But also it means I’ll now probably not be able to afford a new (second hand) car! When we were ‘in’ the SL I was looking forward to saving my City money for a replacement car! Ah well, that’s life I guess. Thanks City, that’s another thing to think about when I think of how I feel about the club now. City ruining car buying since 2021! :-)
I read a bit of RAWK and the rationale for this by some of their idiots was that it was an inevitable consequence of UEFA's failure to get us to abide by FFP. I mean, we know they're a bunch of the most deluded fuckwits imaginable but how in god's name do some of them come to that conclusion?Yes, but there is no guarantee City would have got much positive PR. In fact, many would blame City/PSG spending and failure of UEFA to ban City as reasons for the creation of the Super League.
The hard evidence won't ever be made available to people like you and I. All I can say is that, I see what I see, I know what I know. I read people, I watch, I sit back, I let things unfold, I don't react. Then I make my judgement.Evidence? So awkward, that evidence stuff.
I think the ESL needed City a whole lot more than the other way round. Club were probably railroaded along with offers and inducements too good to refuse. But as the old saying goes; "if it looks like a turd and smells like a turd, it's a turd"!!