hampshireblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Dec 2014
- Messages
- 2,928
The only way Labour can approach it without getting the usual "it was a democratic vote" challenge will be if they, at the same time address the present voting system in this country.
This is exactly what people voted for.Can we change the title of this thread to;
’Does anybody STILL think that this is the brexit that they voted for’?
This is exactly what people voted for.
Absolutely. You're fucking right.This is exactly what people voted for.
Some of the real hardcore nut jobs voted knowingly for this version, but I still think that most were duped by the simplistic fairytale version on the side of the bus with its unicorns, piles of dosh for the NHS, and silly notions of sovereignty, not realising that their vision never existed and never will. In that respect they got what they were voting for but they didn’t actually know what it was that they were voting for.This is exactly what people voted for.
Well brexit isn't quite done (Irish border question)Some of the real hardcore nut jobs voted knowingly for this version, but I still think that most were duped by the simplistic fairytale version on the side of the bus with its unicorns, piles of dosh for the NHS, and silly notions of sovereignty, not realising that their vision never existed and never will. In that respect they got what they were voting for but they didn’t actually know what it was that they were voting for.
There will be some still amongst us who still think it’s a great idea just not being implemented properly but surely the shells must be falling from many eyes now that the ugly truth is rearing up in front of them.
I think it's stupid to even try to evaluate it. Nobody saw the pandemic or the Russian invasion coming, and the problems that has caused. Either one of those would have created turmoil, let alone both of them right on top of one another so to expect us to be entering a wonderful new post-Brexit era right now is just absurd, and that's putting it nicely. It would have taken many years to see any real benefits even without all that.
Does that mean we need to reevaluate the 50 year timescale for real benefits to 60?I think it's stupid to even try to evaluate it. Nobody saw the pandemic or the Russian invasion coming, and the problems that has caused. Either one of those would have created turmoil, let alone both of them right on top of one another so to expect us to be entering a wonderful new post-Brexit era right now is just absurd, and that's putting it nicely. It would have taken many years to see any real benefits even without all that.
Probably. I won't be around either way, so...Does that mean we need to reevaluate the 50 year timescale for real benefits to 60?
Can't really add to anything I said. After what's gone on the past couple of years I really don't think you can evaluate anything. I think we're lucky things are not a lot worse than they are.mate - when pushed on it just after the result before war and pestilence struck even Rees-Mogg said it was a 50 year project. Its a bust - always was going to be a bust - by the 50 year period was up most of the country would not have been alive when we were in the EU so could be told any old bollocks about how bad it was
Isn’t that the point? There aren't any tangible benefits and we’ll all be dead before we see them?Probably. I won't be around either way, so...
Isn’t that the point? There aren't any tangible benefits and we’ll all be dead before we see them?
It’s more likely we’ll be spending Euros by 2040.so will some of our kids - grandkids might see something I suppose - won't be the predicted collapse of the EU I bet
Brace yourself.Can't really add to anything I said. After what's gone on the past couple of years I really don't think you can evaluate anything. I think we're lucky things are not a lot worse than they are.
That’s precisely the point, though. By leaving a stable, established trading and political union we gratuitously and unnecessarily exposed ourselves to the vicissitudes of fortune of international affairs and made ourselves less able to respond to unforeseen global events.I think it's stupid to even try to evaluate it. Nobody saw the pandemic or the Russian invasion coming, and the problems that has caused. Either one of those would have created turmoil, let alone both of them right on top of one another so to expect us to be entering a wonderful new post-Brexit era right now is just absurd, and that's putting it nicely. It would have taken many years to see any real benefits even without all that.
That’s just not either proveable nor true. We made AZ break a contract to have a 6 week head start on vaccination, which cost that company billions of pounds and undermined our status within the EU and more widely too, for no real benefit in hindsight.I think calling it "stable" is a bit of a stretch.
I'm not calling it one way or another, I'm just saying it's impossible to tell because it's far too early. Sure, those events have made a big difference but they would have done either way. Staying in the EU wouldn't have helped, and with the vaccine distribution it might well have made things worse. We did manage to jump a very long EU queue when the vaccine was released, simply because we weren't part of the EU any more.