How Do You Solve A Problem Like Mancini?

Try shooting on sight rather than having a second third an fourth touch, Osman scored yesterday by shooting to the left it hit a wigan player an flew in to the right
Arsenal used to do this tippy tappy shite an got found out.
Get men in the box an get shooting<br /><br />-- Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:42 am --<br /><br />Try shooting on sight rather than having a second third an fourth touch, Osman scored yesterday by shooting to the left it hit a wigan player an flew in to the right
Arsenal used to do this tippy tappy shite an got found out.
Get men in the box an get shooting
 
Try giving ourselves a fighting chance for a start. He waited 20mins before taking Tevez off for Dzeko. Then another 5 before changing Koko Toure for Barry and then the genius of taking off Garcia and purring Lescott up front.

Surely we would have had a better chance with Tevez, Aguero and Dzeko on the pitch?

His tactics are really starting to piss me off. He's almost as bad as Pearce
 
Gelsons Dad said:
onceabluealways said:
robbieh said:
Think he may need to see that what works in England is the united way. Even with a fairly average side they score loads due to the winger system they always play.

That does not mean we have to give up our more sophisticated approach. On the other hand Manicini would say and probably I would agree that had Maicon or Micah or Kolorov or Clichy been fit yesterday we would have won.
But hypothetically playing two midfileders permanently wide would allow more space for Silva and Nasri to operate in.

The question is which two players are best suited for this role?

Milner and Sinclair? With one striker presumambly Kun that leaves Barry, Yaya and Silva in the middle.
Click to expand...

Whe you rely on the fullbacks for your width which is what we do - then when they are all injured it is time to bring in the natural winger you signed otherwise you have very limited attacking options and chance your arm.

Whoops that what he did and it didn't pay off. I'm not sure why sinclair never plays maybe mancini didn't want him but every team has some sort of width to their game - His stubbornness is costing us
Click to expand...


I'm yet to see Sinclair make a single positive contribution on the pitch. I guess that's why he's not on it very often.
Click to expand...

Given that he's had just one start and only come on twice as a sub late on, that's hardly a surprise now is it? Duh!
 
Exeter Blue I am here said:
Gelsons Dad said:
onceabluealways said:
Whe you rely on the fullbacks for your width which is what we do - then when they are all injured it is time to bring in the natural winger you signed otherwise you have very limited attacking options and chance your arm.

Whoops that what he did and it didn't pay off. I'm not sure why sinclair never plays maybe mancini didn't want him but every team has some sort of width to their game - His stubbornness is costing us
Click to expand...


I'm yet to see Sinclair make a single positive contribution on the pitch. I guess that's why he's not on it very often.
Click to expand...

Given that he's had just one start and only come on twice as a sub late on, that's hardly a surprise now is it? Duh!
Click to expand...

Given that Mancini would rather bring on a centre half to go up front than bring on Sinclair may suggest we will never see anything from him.

It was an embarrassing decision
 
guardiola_2380715b.jpg
 
when we have clichy we play different football
he gives extra space to silva to aguero to nasri
i can say it about micah or maicon too
zabaleta also does some job in the attack too but not as well as micah
i love kolarov, but kolarov makes our attacks slower and i don't like when player can't play with the second leg and always needs extra time to work with ball/ like barry lescott
clichy and zaba dont have this problem but for left footers it's harder than for right footers
so when clichy and mika ar on the pitch we have extra opportunities in the attack
but yesterday mancini did the biggest mistake when after the goal he didn;t change tevez and garsia/ if he had done that we could have won......
but playing with tevez and aguero is the main reason why we can;t score like last year.
last year we were playing withe dzeko-aguero ro balo-ageuero and strong forward in the attack was giviing more space to aguero and he was scoring.also crosses from the clichy and mika had some value but now when two little forwards are playing against tall defenders there is no point in doing that and we have only one opportunity to play on small passes. so when teams like sunderland. stoke, everton are defending its difficult to score a goal because we are not barsa and we don't have xavi iniesta or messi to break deffences like that../
if we want to win PL this season we have 3 ways
1) balo must start scoring and playing seriosly
2) give a chance to guidetti
3) sell dzeko and balo and buy with that money a top class forward who will play with aguero or tevez and give them space..
 
lionheart said:
Easy, just tell him to give the boys more shooting practice, preferably involving moving obstacles. If we could shoot on sight (like Bale and RVP), the chances are that more goals will be scored. In their defence, at least Yaya and Milner did try occasionally. Practice makes perfect.
Click to expand...

Bale has a terrible shots to goals ratio, he will drive us nuts if he ever joins.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.