Blue Boy 63
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 263
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Scarlett Johansson is currently in the utility doing my ironing in nowt but that gorgeous 09/10 umbro top.
Oh hang on that's just made up bollocks.
A bit like this bizarre idea that the conservatives are more competent with the economy than Labour. There is absolutely no evidence to support it. It's a complicated subect at the best of times and the reality is historically there's not huge quantative differences between the macro economic performance of the two main parties.
As for individual historical economic events they are rarely the exclusive result of the policy approach of the incumbent government. For example it takes about half an hour to understand that something like Callaghan having to go to the IMF in '76 had it's roots in a variety of things not least of which was the previous Heath administration. Arguably if you want to play the blame game there's more instances of Conservative administrations shooting themselves in the foot economically than Labour both long term and short term. I think this is partly because Conservative governments since the 80s have been driven by ideology rather than prudence.
Someone should do a PhD into why the British public persist in buying into this bollocks. I suspect the answer is a preparedness to accept inappropriate analogies, a lack of curiosity and our good old friends the fourth estate.
The Tories have always borrowed more than Labour, and always repaid less: they are the party of big deficit spending
It is often suggested that Labour is profligate and the Tories are the naturally ‘safe pair of hands’ when it comes to running the economy. The Tories, it is presumed, do not borrow as much as Labour. This is a hypothesis I have tested before. I thought it time to...
www.taxresearch.org.uk