Huddersfield (A) Post Match Thread

First half was annoying.
Marriner did anything to help Hudds into the match, allowing loads of foul contacts, disallowing a clear pen, joke.

KDB and Gundogan standing too high in half spaces near the box
and Fern struggled to find them.
Also Fern was caught several times when he was too slow releasing the ball.
Not much creativity being the consequence of all that.
Best pass was KDB's to Raz, but Marriner had a heart for the booing lot...

Pep will have had some comments during the break, 2nd half being better.

Anyway, job done. Onwards and upwards.
 
So, the non-penalty decision was because there's an agenda against us and Marriner is a cheat (and not incompetent) whilst the Sterling goal, despite possibly Sane being offside is because the officials are incompetent (and not cheats). Talk about hypocrisy. Same people every week, must be hard to walk around with the weight of 6 baked potatoes on each shoulder.
He wasn't, the defender on the far side played him on.
 
So, the non-penalty decision was because there's an agenda against us and Marriner is a cheat (and not incompetent) whilst the Sterling goal, despite possibly Sane being offside is because the officials are incompetent (and not cheats). Talk about hypocrisy. Same people every week, must be hard to walk around with the weight of 6 baked potatoes on each shoulder.
Ok what was the reason for not giving the pen?
 
So, the non-penalty decision was because there's an agenda against us and Marriner is a cheat (and not incompetent) whilst the Sterling goal, despite possibly Sane being offside is because the officials are incompetent (and not cheats). Talk about hypocrisy. Same people every week, must be hard to walk around with the weight of 6 baked potatoes on each shoulder.

So you believe Marriner and the linesman were just incompetent not to give a penalty that everybody, fans, Sky, newspapers, the queen have said was a penalty ? Two well paid officials are just incompetent - dear oh dear, and as has been said for Sterlings goal, there were two players between the linesman and Sane blocking a clear view and those that say it was offside are saying his foot was just in front. That is a hell of a tough call to make in a split second. It has nothing to do with hypocrisy, just blatant cheating.
 
So you believe Marriner and the linesman were just incompetent not to give a penalty that everybody, fans, Sky, newspapers, the queen have said was a penalty ? Two well paid officials are just incompetent - dear oh dear, and as has been said for Sterlings goal, there were two players between the linesman and Sane blocking a clear view and those that say it was offside are saying his foot was just in front. That is a hell of a tough call to make in a split second. It has nothing to do with hypocrisy, just blatant cheating.

They have been brainwashed into believing he is a diver, & he plays for a team of financial doping cheats in a battle agIainst the team 'all neutrals want to win, for the good of football'.

What's the easiest decision to give ?
 
3 points
No injuries
As much as we could wish for
Really not bothered about the performance; right now that’s inconsequential
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.