Huw Edwards - 6 month suspended sentence (pg 107)

Seems we live in a country that gives you three years if you put out a FB post saying “Take photos of naked kids”, but gives us F all if we actually take or posses them….
 
plenty did get jail sentences for saying a lot less though, i guess thats the point.

Huw edwards gets a sexual turn on by looking at sexually explicit photos of young boys. Hes a monster and should be in prison and be on the sex offenders register til he dies because in 7 years time he will still fancy little boys.


Facebook posts and paedo news readers are two extremely different crimes but surely you see why people get pissed off with the unfairness of the sentences handed down to each case
The poster i was replying to likes to put out one liners , thinks it is edgy , have told him the woman was telling the mob to murder a hotel full of people , no two cases are the same as he well knows

Edwards should be in prison, of course he should
 
Rolf Harris and Stuart Hall agreed but it’s so obvious Jimmy Savile was an absolute wrong ‘un from day one.

I’d watch Jim’ll Fix It and TOTP as a child but always found him very, very strange.


NOW THEN!

NOW THEN!!

NOW THEN!!
 
It really is a fucking piss take isn’t it.

It's not really, all those saying 'yet you get 2/3/4 years for sharing a meme or a Facebook post' are seriously downplaying the fact that what they were actually doing was inciting violence so extreme there was a real risk some would have been stuck inside a building whilst it was on fire, that's what those all so harmless people caused by sharing and encouraging locations of Mosques and Hotels, far more should have been punished but there isn't enough space in prisons so they had to make an example out of very few and it worked to stop the riots and discourage others who are thinking of doing the same in the future - those downplaying the gravity of those social media posts are the ones that are taking the piss.
 
Funny how people with money and in the public eye can get away with lesser sentences than Joe Public.
They get the same. It’s just that people don’t realise it and want everybody punished harder than the law suggests, regardless of crime. (FB incitement aside)
 
I was at a home match when the news broke on Twitter and told the mutual faces around me. Everyone saddened because they saw a prolific charity fundraiser.


He was prolific alright, all the people who knew and said nothing should be ashamed of themselves for putting their careers first, the ones that did speak out were strangely ignored.
 
It's not really, all those saying 'yet you get 2/3/4 years for sharing a meme or a Facebook post' are seriously downplaying the fact that what they were actually doing was inciting violence so extreme there was a real risk some would have been stuck inside a building whilst it was on fire, that's what those all so harmless people caused by sharing and encouraging locations of Mosques and Hotels, far more should have been punished but there isn't enough space in prisons so they had to make an example out of very few and it worked to stop the riots and discourage others who are thinking of doing the same in the future - those downplaying the gravity of those social media posts are the ones that are taking the piss.
Get to fuck. Nonces getting off with noncing is what takes the piss.

Fucking hell.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.