bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
It will continue until they invent TV where we can slap the cunts across the face as they lie
I am voting Labour next ....talk me out of it.
- Thread starter ColinBellsjockstrap
- Start date
It will continue until they invent TV where we can slap the cunts across the face as they lie
OK,
Since 1971 I have always voted for the Conservative party, a Margaret Thatcher fan (Although she did have her faults), but I am now totally disillusioned with this shower of st who go from crisis to crisis,( I do have a certain amount of sympathy with them because they did have covid19 to deal with, which must have been a nightmare)...but now I have had enough.
Liz Truss and that idiotic chancellor was the last straw.
Now I know Starmer is rather bland and doesn't seem to come up with any policies. just criticise the Tories all the time and I used to hate Angela Rayner but I am coming round to thinking she is OK, talks a lot of sense, even though she lets her mouth get carried away a bit, but time for a new broom?
Thoughts?
Two words: Angela Rayner (your first observation was the correct one).
Kier Starmer should have moved her aside.... he tried, but somehow she ended up with more jobs & more power! I don't know how. But it made him look weak and that is not a good characteristic for a so-called 'leader'.
That recording of her calling people who support the Tories 'scum' will come back to haunt the Labour Party in the future - a bit like how Gordon Brown got caught out calling a member of the public a bigot, just because she wasn't quite as 'liberal' as he wanted.
Plus, at the end of the day people want control of "our borders, our laws and our money" - the Tories have totally billhooksed up all three so far, but mainly due to lefty lawyers and judges and civil servants sticking their noses in, which at the end of the day the Tories will use to get back into power. So you might as well just vote for them anyway, as otherwise your vote is wasted.
Although if Sunak and in particular Braverman don't get things sorted in the next 18 months, I will probably not vote at all, which I am really loathed to admit. But the system is totally messed up and I am pretty fed up with the whole bl00dy thing.
Last edited:
Scottyboi
Well-Known Member
GB news on alot in your house? Lefty lawyers lmao you mean people protecting the rights of fellow human beings? So bitter.
Read this and get back to me.....
"In the early hours of March 12, 2022, Thomas Roberts had his beautiful young life taken from him. Aged just 21, Thomas, a part-time DJ with aspirations to join the Royal Marines, intervened to try and calm down a fight in Bournemouth town centre over an e-scooter. He was stabbed in the heart and the stomach by Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai. The asylum seeker was convicted this week of Thomas’s murder and, although Abdulrahimzai did indeed deliver the fatal wounds, it was the Home Office which was and is responsible for Tom Roberts’s appalling and unnecessary death, I believe.
The Home Office and the militantly-compassionate cadre of refugee charities and lawyers who think that the human rights of Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai are far more important than, say, the safety of British citizens like Thomas Roberts.
When he arrived in Dorset on a ferry from Cherbourg on Boxing Day 2019, Abdulrahimzai told the authorities that he was a 14-year-old orphan from Afghanistan. In fact, the drug dealer was well over 18 and had already been sentenced to 20 years in a Serbian jail (in his absence) for murdering two fellow migrants with a Kalashnikov. A few weeks before this charming fellow came to the UK, an asylum claim he made in Norway had been very sensibly rejected by the authorities there.
No such good sense was to be found among our own hapless Border Force. They waved the convicted murderer into the country as a “child”. Immigration officials don’t appear to have believed that Abdulrahimzai was a young teenager but, under Home Office rules, they had to give him the benefit of the doubt. He could only be treated as an adult if his physical appearance and demeanour “strongly suggested” he was 25 or over. He was admitted to the care of a foster mother who soon noticed a propensity for violence and a worrying fondness for knives, which he seemed to believe he had the right to carry. Never mind that scary detail, he would officially be regarded as a child until a thorough “Merton” test of his age could be carried out by expert social workers.
You can guess what happened next. This deeply dangerous individual, supported by do-gooding immigration lawyers, “messed around” officials and failed to attend interviews. There was a considerable delay in the submission of Abdulrahimzai’s statement of evidence to support his asylum claim.
A test to evaluate his true age was only carried out in February 2022, more than two years after Abdulrahimzai’s arrival in England and just a month before he killed poor Thomas. Meanwhile, he was given a place at a secondary school in Bournemouth where the kids were said to be terrified of him.
How many more are there in this country like Abdulrahimzai, ticking timebombs who could so easily destroy the lives of innocent people? With the surge in small boats arriving on the Kent coast (65,000 migrants are predicted to cross the Channel in 2023), and the almost inevitable destruction of personal documents, there has been a big rise in the number of unaccompanied “child” refugees. Home Office data shows there were 1,696 cases where the age of the child migrant was called into question in the year to September 2021. Of those, 1,118 – or 66 per cent – were found to be 18 or older. According to the Home Office, between 2012 and 2021 some 52 asylum seekers claiming to be children were later found to be 30 years old or more. Thirty! Bearded and balding kids, welcome to the United Kingdom; please step this way!"
The Home Office must stop wringing its hands and start protecting its own citizens
Yet again, the wishes of the silent majority are overruled by the claims of a vocal minority cynically commanding preferential treatment
www.telegraph.co.uk
There is 'protecting the rights of fellow human beings' and it's a laudable aim, but the first and most important job of a Government is to protect the country and the people within it. That isn't happening. Norway rejected this person and so should we have.
P.S. It is good we now have GB News and indeed TalkTV as there needed to be some balance to the onslaught of 'PC' news from the BBC and Channel 4.
Last edited:
Scottyboi
Well-Known Member
Read this and get back to me.....
"In the early hours of March 12, 2022, Thomas Roberts had his beautiful young life taken from him. Aged just 21, Thomas, a part-time DJ with aspirations to join the Royal Marines, intervened to try and calm down a fight in Bournemouth town centre over an e-scooter. He was stabbed in the heart and the stomach by Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai. The asylum seeker was convicted this week of Thomas’s murder and, although Abdulrahimzai did indeed deliver the fatal wounds, it was the Home Office which was and is responsible for Tom Roberts’s appalling and unnecessary death, I believe.
The Home Office and the militantly-compassionate cadre of refugee charities and lawyers who think that the human rights of Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai are far more important than, say, the safety of British citizens like Thomas Roberts.
When he arrived in Dorset on a ferry from Cherbourg on Boxing Day 2019, Abdulrahimzai told the authorities that he was a 14-year-old orphan from Afghanistan. In fact, the drug dealer was well over 18 and had already been sentenced to 20 years in a Serbian jail (in his absence) for murdering two fellow migrants with a Kalashnikov. A few weeks before this charming fellow came to the UK, an asylum claim he made in Norway had been very sensibly rejected by the authorities there.
No such good sense was to be found among our own hapless Border Force. They waved the convicted murderer into the country as a “child”. Immigration officials don’t appear to have believed that Abdulrahimzai was a young teenager but, under Home Office rules, they had to give him the benefit of the doubt. He could only be treated as an adult if his physical appearance and demeanour “strongly suggested” he was 25 or over. He was admitted to the care of a foster mother who soon noticed a propensity for violence and a worrying fondness for knives, which he seemed to believe he had the right to carry. Never mind that scary detail, he would officially be regarded as a child until a thorough “Merton” test of his age could be carried out by expert social workers.
You can guess what happened next. This deeply dangerous individual, supported by do-gooding immigration lawyers, “messed around” officials and failed to attend interviews. There was a considerable delay in the submission of Abdulrahimzai’s statement of evidence to support his asylum claim.
A test to evaluate his true age was only carried out in February 2022, more than two years after Abdulrahimzai’s arrival in England and just a month before he killed poor Thomas. Meanwhile, he was given a place at a secondary school in Bournemouth where the kids were said to be terrified of him.
How many more are there in this country like Abdulrahimzai, ticking timebombs who could so easily destroy the lives of innocent people? With the surge in small boats arriving on the Kent coast (65,000 migrants are predicted to cross the Channel in 2023), and the almost inevitable destruction of personal documents, there has been a big rise in the number of unaccompanied “child” refugees. Home Office data shows there were 1,696 cases where the age of the child migrant was called into question in the year to September 2021. Of those, 1,118 – or 66 per cent – were found to be 18 or older. According to the Home Office, between 2012 and 2021 some 52 asylum seekers claiming to be children were later found to be 30 years old or more. Thirty! Bearded and balding kids, welcome to the United Kingdom; please step this way!"
The Home Office must stop wringing its hands and start protecting its own citizens
Yet again, the wishes of the silent majority are overruled by the claims of a vocal minority cynically commanding preferential treatment
There is 'protecting the rights of fellow human beings' and its a laudible aim, but the first and most important job of a Government is to protect the country and the people within it. That isn't happening. Norway rejected this person and so should we have.
P.S. It is good we now have GB News and indeed TalkTV as there needed to be some balance to the onslaught of 'PC' news from the BBC and Channel 4.
Ahh the government in which border force went on strike, the underfunded shitshow of our asylum process which allows scum like him to attend school and go on to kill.
I'd say it's fuck all to do with lefty lawyers and everything to do with the government. But it's easier to blame those you didn't vote for so you don't have to take any responsibility for helping the tories be in power in the first place.
Norway rejected this criminal, we accepted him. When I say 'we' was it the government or their minions?
When Norway rejected him, was it the Norway government, or their minions?
I don't know - I don't want to fall out with a fellow blue, I am just really fed up right now.
I don't even think I will vote in the next G.E. and that upsets me too bearing in mind that in history people fought for the vote & yet I ask what is the point? because they are all as bad as each other, in modern times.
P.S. When you say "...it's fuck all to do with lefty lawyers and everything to do with the government" how do you account for the Rwanda plan situation? That is clearly a policy that government wanted (and wants) to implement, but who and what has stopped it from happening?
Last edited:
christened at st marks
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 5,315
It's a rag song
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 17,348
I believe the answer to this is..
You're nuts.
No need for an hour of your time on the chaise lounge.
That will be £100, please.
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 11,081
- Team supported
- City
The Tory voters remind me of the Rags, not interested when it’s all going wrong but out in force when there’s chance of a resurgence.
The law. What is happening, or has happened, is that the government deliberately announces policy that they believe will court the opinion of their hard-core support (immigration issues are very popular) without prior legal consideration. When the action fails, as they knew it would, their media friends heap the blame on the woke snowflakes and lefty lawyers, whipping their support into yet another frenzy of hate. Only recently, in the Select Committee meeting, Suella was forced to admit that there are no safe and legal routes to arrive in the UK. This is deliberate. Therefore, everyone arriving is illegal and up for demonising. Just open the safe and legal routes and properly process asylum claims - it isn't that difficult - unless you fear the golf club captains and ladies of the institutes.