Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 38,063
All this dissent will dissipate when he comes.
The whole club will be euphoric.
I can't wait.
The whole club will be euphoric.
I can't wait.
Eggsy said:He has not even been able to bring all his own backroom staff with him let alone bring in his own players. Does anybody believe that Brian Kidd was Mancini's choice as assistant ?Ricster said:Let Mancini get in his own players, and get rid of the dead wood that doesn't want to play and rather just pick up hefty amounts of money and then we'll move forward under Mancini.
We're moving in the right direction. He just needs to put his own touch on it.
I hope that he does get the time, but I will be suprised if he can not even bring his own team in to help himachieve this.
Didsbury Dave said:All this dissent will dissipate when he comes.
The whole club will be euphoric.
I can't wait.
Didsbury Dave said:All this dissent will dissipate when he comes.
The whole club will be euphoric.
I can't wait.
OrigamiNinja said:The only question that needs to be answered is Will Mancini have us challenging for the title? If the answer is yes then we should stick with him no matter what the standard of football because at the end of whichever season it is we as fans will not be saying "I am not bothered that we won the title, the standard of football was rubbish"!
My concern is that the answer to the above question is no! I see him turning us into a carbon copy of Benitez's Liverpool and that worries me greatly. The history of the Prem tells you that its the teams that score plenty of goals that wins titles. Mancini has us playing for a 1-0 win every week at this moment in time, if he achieved it I would have no complaints but it just does not look like happening.
Now people can slate Mourinhos style of play (personally I think it is myth that his teams are boring) but they get the job done, if Mourinho had us playing for 1-0 wins every week he would make damn sure that we did it.
I am tired of ifs, buts and maybes, we had Hughes who might have got us top 4, we now have Mancini who might get us top 4 but Mourinho would get us top 4, no ifs, buts or maybes. If there was ever a club that needs the over confidence and brashness of Mr Mourinho it is Manchester City, for too long the mentality of the club has been all wrong, happy to be 2nd best and then have a good laugh at ourselves whilst muttering the words 'typical City'. Its about time we had a born winner in charge who doesnt settle for 2nd best, who in fact demands success and will dispense with the term 'typical City' once and for all.
It's difficult to argue with a single word of that. The appointment of Mourinho would be inspirational for the whole club and would be welcomed hugely by just about every City fan possible.
But... and there's always a but... why are people on here presuming he's coming? Why are they so convinced?
I would love him at City, but I've offered bets to previous posters, confirmed that Mourinho was coming, and they didn't take me up on it... so what is their impeccable source?
So, for me, he's not coming... and why would he?
If we make top 4 Mancini keeps his job... If we fail to make top 4, why woulkd Mancini take on a club like that?
I get the strong impression that Mourinho is playing games again and is keen to get his name on the radar of other clubs as he looks to move on in the summer.
Does anyone really think he'd choose us above Real Madrid, Liverpool or the Rags? And all three jobs might be up for grabs in the summer.
So instead of fantasising about the Special One at City... get behind the current manager and hope he achives the objectives. And if he doesn't then who do we replace him with if Mourinho is just taking the piss out of us?
Hiddink's gone... and that leaves? And I'm struggling to think of ANY other name i would be skipping about if we appointed them.
Sometimes it's better the devil you know...
Forza Mancini. Mourinho at Manchester City is a match made in heaven!
Soulboy said:OrigamiNinja said:The only question that needs to be answered is Will Mancini have us challenging for the title? If the answer is yes then we should stick with him no matter what the standard of football because at the end of whichever season it is we as fans will not be saying "I am not bothered that we won the title, the standard of football was rubbish"!
My concern is that the answer to the above question is no! I see him turning us into a carbon copy of Benitez's Liverpool and that worries me greatly. The history of the Prem tells you that its the teams that score plenty of goals that wins titles. Mancini has us playing for a 1-0 win every week at this moment in time, if he achieved it I would have no complaints but it just does not look like happening.
Now people can slate Mourinhos style of play (personally I think it is myth that his teams are boring) but they get the job done, if Mourinho had us playing for 1-0 wins every week he would make damn sure that we did it.
I am tired of ifs, buts and maybes, we had Hughes who might have got us top 4, we now have Mancini who might get us top 4 but Mourinho would get us top 4, no ifs, buts or maybes. If there was ever a club that needs the over confidence and brashness of Mr Mourinho it is Manchester City, for too long the mentality of the club has been all wrong, happy to be 2nd best and then have a good laugh at ourselves whilst muttering the words 'typical City'. Its about time we had a born winner in charge who doesnt settle for 2nd best, who in fact demands success and will dispense with the term 'typical City' once and for all.
It's difficult to argue with a single word of that. The appointment of Mourinho would be inspirational for the whole club and would be welcomed hugely by just about every City fan possible.
But... and there's always a but... why are people on here presuming he's coming? Why are they so convinced?
I would love him at City, but I've offered bets to previous posters, confirmed that Mourinho was coming, and they didn't take me up on it... so what is their impeccable source?
So, for me, he's not coming... and why would he?
If we make top 4 Mancini keeps his job... If we fail to make top 4, why woulkd Mancini take on a club like that?
I get the strong impression that Mourinho is playing games again and is keen to get his name on the radar of other clubs as he looks to move on in the summer.
Does anyone really think he'd choose us above Real Madrid, Liverpool or the Rags? And all three jobs might be up for grabs in the summer.
So instead of fantasising about the Special One at City... get behind the current manager and hope he achives the objectives. And if he doesn't then who do we replace him with if Mourinho is just taking the piss out of us?
Hiddink's gone... and that leaves? And I'm struggling to think of ANY other name i would be skipping about if we appointed them.
Sometimes it's better the devil you know...
Forza Mancini. Mourinho at Manchester City is a match made in heaven!
OrigamiNinja said:
I do not know whether he is coming or not, you may very well be correct about him playing games but I guess what I am saying is that IF he is available and IF he wants the job then he should be given it no matter what and when I say 'no matter what' I include even if Mancini gets us into the Champions League!