Illegal PL streaming - 11 years in prison for "gang" leader.

I thought it was because of reduced gates at lower league clubs.
I know plenty who go to Chester, and a few who go to Stockport, and it would make zero difference to them if there was a clash with “another” PL game on the telly.
 
I know plenty who go to Chester, and a few who go to Stockport, and it would make zero difference to them if there was a clash with “another” PL game on the telly.
I'm sure the majority of other clubs supporters wouldn't care less who was on the telly mate.
But when I was a kid, we would sometimes go and watch Oldham if City were playing away.
We wouldn't if City were on the telly. Anyway, that's just the reason I had heard. Not saying it makes sense.
 
I'm sure the majority of other clubs supporters wouldn't care less who was on the telly mate.
But when I was a kid, we would sometimes go and watch Oldham if City were playing away.
We wouldn't if City were on the telly. Anyway, that's just the reason I had heard. Not saying it makes sense.
Yep, bit more common back then, agreed pal.
 
I thought it was because of reduced gates at lower league clubs.
I think that was a reason given.

The thing is, they have 12.30 games on tele when fans would be travelling to these lower league games and one at 17.30 when they’d be travelling home.

So it makes no sense; if they would rather watch the Prem on tele than go to a lower league game, they get to watch two rather than going instead now so surely they’re going to be staying at home to watch both of those?
 
I think that was a reason given.

The thing is, they have 12.30 games on tele when fans would be travelling to these lower league games and one at 17.30 when they’d be travelling home.

So it makes no sense; if they would rather watch the Prem on tele than go to a lower league game, they get to watch two rather than going instead now so surely they’re going to be staying at home to watch both of those?
I think it's an outdated rule mate.
 
Interesting that. But in terms of popularity/demand in the home country wouldn’t American Football be a better comparison - what does that cost per month pal?
Sorry I should have added that CBS and their Paramount stream service also has NFL on it (so included in the $5.99 a month) as well as CBS series and films
ESPN+ also includes 100's of other sports including the Championship.
Peacock doesn't have other sports but does have loads and loads of series / films
 
Sorry I should have added that CBS and their Paramount stream service also has NFL on it (so included in the $5.99 a month) as well as CBS series and films
ESPN+ also includes 100's of other sports including the Championship.
Peacock doesn't have other sports but does have loads and loads of series / films
So to get the max amount of NFL coverage only costs $5.99 a month? Don’t you need a Fox subscription too?
Just trying to compare cost of fullest NFL coverage in the US vs fullest footy coverage over here.
 
So to get the max amount of NFL coverage only costs $5.99 a month? Don’t you need a Fox subscription too?
Just trying to compare cost of fullest NFL coverage in the US vs fullest footy coverage over here.
NFL+ is a service for US customers only, not to be confused with gamepass (allows international purchases). This costs 5 dollars a month or 40 dollars for the season. You can get premium that has stuff like coaching films etc to for 10 dollars a month if you want all the bells and whistles. The basic service covers local games and prime time.

 
Last edited:
NFL+ is a service for US customers only, not to be confused with gamepass (allows international purchases). This costs 5 dollars a month or 40 dollars for the season. You can get premium that has stuff like coaching films etc to for 10 dollars a month if you want all the bells and whistles. The basic service covers local games and prime time.

Cheers for that.

Just doing a quick bit of research, for tv (as opposed to on your phone) coverage of the matches, it looks like NBC, CBS and ABC are all free to air(?), but Fox Sports costs between €74.99 and €40 per month. I don’t know the exchange rate, but it seems to be a similar (if not greater) amount to what sky sports are charging UK customers.
Both aren’t small amounts - and the footy season is twice as long as the nfl of course!
 
I enjoy watching all matches plus boxing. Subscribe to this illegal streaming and you’re responsible for these men being imprisoned.
No your not. That has got to be the daftest comment I've heard in ages.
(I don't go on the match day thread)
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.