Is it time that Onouha was properly part of the squad ?

[DontLookBackInAnger]

Re: Re: Is it time that Onouha was properly part of the squad ?

Another one with no clue. It's getting boring now.

forgive me he hasn't dropped down the club to the point he doesn't get close to the first team??? I must be missing something and 3 managers haven't signed 4 right backs.....and 5 CBs in the last 4 seasons over giving Onouha an extended run in the first team. It's funny when people attack other posters from the point that "they don't have a clue" and can only do so by attacking the person and not presenting facts. It's clear that there are posters on this board that don't have a clue, but I will leave it to the most arrogant members of the board to police such matters.

As a 'so called' City fan, you would know why players have been bought whilst the lad has been at the club.

It should tell you something else as well, but I hate pointing out obvious things to people that only see the surface of things.

Oh and that Kolarov was bang out of order for kicking off cos he was subbed.

He should do one...

I'm not privvy to why anyone was bought into a club, but its not unreasonable to assume that if players a bought repeatedly for the same role as theirs at a club that the manager either thinks they need more time to develop or they just don't fancy them.

As for the whole Kolarov thing, seeing as I was at the game last night and from behind the goal in the away-end it wasn't something you could see, I will defer to you on the matter because I'm sure from your viewing point it was much easier to see.

 

[Josh Blue]

He had a really good game theres no aruging that, well in Ned.

 

[bluefromleve32]

he was shit. he give the ball away and was caught out of position how many times? the sooner he and his greedy little cunty mate bridge fuck off the better

 

[fuzz barricade]

Have got to say i totally disagree he didn't look comfortable last night AT ALL. a few times he either gave the ball away or nearly did in controlling it, isn't the best defensive player we have in defense but is physically brilliant. Not good enough for us anymore i'm afraid. poor mans micah richards

 

[TCIB]

Re: Re: Is it time that Onouha was properly part of the squad ?

When you consider Onouha is older than Richards has slipped below Boyata at the club and we have brought in a great many RB/CBs with 3 managers and none of them reallyfancied him, it seems clear that he isn't likely to be here long term.

Another one with no clue. It's getting boring now.

Well Kia was employed by ned/his mum. That email had to of come from one of said parties.
Unless you suggest this was all from an outside party who somehow had access to Ned and his mothers personal data and acted totally outside teh knowledge of Ned ?

Kia has no commercial relationship with Onuoha. The person responsible for releasing the email to the press was Ian Wright, who is a friend of theirs.

Interesting that no one has really had a comeback to this post.

Says a hell of a lot.

What does it say then Bigga ? apart from the fact we have lives and do not all hang around waiting for replies on a forum 24/7.
Surely you are not insinuating because there has not been an immediate reply his word is gospel and correct as opposed to us (those who dislike what he did and do not forgive him) ?.
Your insinuative methods of posting are a very ugly tbh.

Now i'm here i shall reply, do you have some documentation on this PB ?. Either way it would not matter as the original point stands regarding Neds conduct. If it was Wright or Kia the fact remains this info was given to one of them from Neds mother/adviser and it is a very nasty low trick.
This will have been known by Ned, Absolubtly no way would such action be taken on the issue without Nedum being consulted. The fact also remains it was an incidious, Underhand, Down right dirty trick designed to attack the club due to camp Ned's personal agendas .
It is always nice for more reasons to hate that snake Kia but the issue here was Nedums conduct.

Kia Joorabchian is Nedum's "representative" and the idea he does this out of the goodness of his heart is well i will take a leap of faith here and call it "bollocks".

"I'm not surprised at this level of interest, because Nedum has proven that he's a very good player," Joorabchian told BBC Sport."

Now if your saying this is not indicative of commercial representation i will have to question that claim. Kia gets paid for such work and to suggest otherwise i find very hard to beleive.
Again though it does not really matter but still i felt the need to say it.

 

[LongsightM13]

It truly saddens me that a hardcore academy blue and Collyhurst lad like Ned doesn't get a sniff anymore. But his mum Dr Onuohah's decision to lie down with a dog will inevitably end with her son catching fleas
I think the fact Roberto still plays him occasionally shows that he is a better man than Ned's alleged 'adviser'.

 

[Anonymous]

i love to see ned in our first team

 

[Bigga]

Re: Re: Is it time that Onouha was properly part of the squad ?

When you consider Onouha is older than Richards has slipped below Boyata at the club and we have brought in a great many RB/CBs with 3 managers and none of them reallyfancied him, it seems clear that he isn't likely to be here long term.

Another one with no clue. It's getting boring now.

Kia has no commercial relationship with Onuoha. The person responsible for releasing the email to the press was Ian Wright, who is a friend of theirs.

Interesting that no one has really had a comeback to this post.

Says a hell of a lot.

What does it say then Bigga ? apart from the fact we have lives and do not all hang around waiting for replies on a forum 24/7.
Surely you are not insinuating because there has not been an immediate reply his word is gospel and correct as opposed to us (those who dislike what he did and do not forgive him) ?.
Your insinuative methods of posting are a very ugly tbh.

Now i'm here i shall reply, do you have some documentation on this PB ?. Either way it would not matter as the original point stands regarding Neds conduct. If it was Wright or Kia the fact remains this info was given to one of them from Neds mother/adviser and it is a very nasty low trick.
This will have been known by Ned, Absolubtly no way would such action be taken on the issue without Nedum being consulted. The fact also remains it was an incidious, Underhand, Down right dirty trick designed to attack the club due to camp Ned's personal agendas .
It is always nice for more reasons to hate that snake Kia but the issue here was Nedums conduct.

Kia Joorabchian is Nedum's "representative" and the idea he does this out of the goodness of his heart is well i will take a leap of faith here and call it "bollocks".

"I'm not surprised at this level of interest, because Nedum has proven that he's a very good player," Joorabchian told BBC Sport."

Now if your saying this is not indicative of commercial representation i will have to question that claim. Kia gets paid for such work and to suggest otherwise i find very hard to beleive.
Again though it does not really matter but still i felt the need to say it.

I'm highly bemused at your insistence of the way events have played out in your mind. You have no solid evidence of such a thing and yet in the astoundingly impressive manner of Sherlock Holmes, himself, you have basically hung, drawn and quartered a player that loves this club to its metal bones.

The problem your 'detective' work runs in to is that Nedum was the one in a running fight with Cook. It might be me, but I don't think there were e-mail exchanges between the two (but feel free to prove me wrong...).

So, let's look at it a different way and I could be just as wrong...

Mrs O consults KtS over advice about clubs or how to talk to Cook, the e-mail exchanges begin, Mrs O shows KtS a e-mail she's decided is offensive as is her right, KtS keeps said mail and uses it in many ways (Wright being one exponent) in battles with Cook, KtS allows Wright to use mail a year later in escalating battle, Mrs O and Neds caught in crossfire but Mrs O won't lie about having chats about this matter with City the year before, but because of this it's her fault and she's The Devil.

How, again, is Neds to have anything to do with this matter in this scenario, which is just as likely, if not more so, than yours??

Presumption is a dangerous game...

 

[TCIB]

We shall agree to have differing opinions matey.

Now though is a time to lol at trafford i think that we both can agree on :)

 

[Bigga]

We shall agree to have differing opinions matey.

Now though is a time to lol at trafford i think that we both can agree on :)

Indeed!

I sent this following text to a Rag:

"The Minnows of Manchester came close to causing a major upset to the Mighty Crystal Palace. I thought the ref could have been on their side more, but at least they came close!!"