Is it time to unmask the muslim woman?

PistonBlue said:
No, not a security issue at all. Who's scared of a shy little woman?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/06/female-suicide-bomber-murders-two-us-soldiers-in-afghanistan-with-bomb-hidden-beneath-her-burqa.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/06/femal ... burqa.html</a>

lovely little website that.

Ironically, if she'd have dressed in western clothes then she would have been probably been spotted.
 
sweep said:
If we ban all these terrorists running around Britain from covering their faces and their bombs with these muslim dresses won't they just use hoodies and rucksacks instead? I know these people aren't that bright so will probably just stick to their traditional terrorist disguise and I don't want to give them ideas, just putting it out there.

Mods feel free to delete if you feel this post threatens national security.


These people arent bright? hmmm as bright as your post might sound!

NULL!
 
MaineDAWG2008 said:
sweep said:
If we ban all these terrorists running around Britain from covering their faces and their bombs with these muslim dresses won't they just use hoodies and rucksacks instead? I know these people aren't that bright so will probably just stick to their traditional terrorist disguise and I don't want to give them ideas, just putting it out there.

Mods feel free to delete if you feel this post threatens national security.


These people arent bright? hmmm as bright as your post might sound!

NULL!

He's saying that terrorists aren't bright, not Muslims, stop being so touchy.

Personally, sacrificing yourself in the name of a religious belief system so that you can gain better placement in the kingdom of the magic man in the sky is pretty stupid. As is the belief that a religion that is built upon civil trust and acceptance of others would want you to kill a bunch of people to send a message to the government. If you want to kill the government, bomb Westminister, not airports and buses. Terrorists have exactly fuck all to do with Islam, and everything to do with politics. They are using their warped interpretation of the Quran and the Hadith to justify their political viewpoints.
It's not unlike Khomeni and his "Great Satan" bollocks in Iran a few decades back. It isn't Islam, it's using certain phrases from the texts and building an entire system of propaganda around them, usually to keep certain men in power. It's funny that I've never heard one of these self serving wankers say that Islam promotes democracy; instead using it to their own ends to become dictators.

There are many things wrong with Islam, just as there are many things wrong with Christianity, Judaism, and Hinduism. But in my opinion, we should nail religions to the wall for the things that they actually stand for, and not for the things that some extreme nutjob says it stands for.
 
i think some of you guys need real educating.

A muslim woman a terrorist? Well you might have heard of stories of women blowing themselves up, be it in afghanistan, israel or iraq, but it doesnt mean she will do the same over here. Not all women wearing Niqaabs are terrorists. That is just a stereo typical thought. So lets just suggest if a hoody is caught stealing from lets just say tescos, all hoodys will do the same?

How would majority of you feel if the africans or asians labelled every whiteman a peadophile? Why lets look at the majority of the peadophile cases....ooh snap! they are all white people?! So im gnna address everyone here who is white as a Peadophile?

Sheesh you guys. lets get real here. i believe we have to treat each case differently.

But having said all that, Im a muslim and i dont agree with Niqaabs. Then again I dont agree with women having tatoos. But it doesnt mean we impose rules on them. We have to make an educated judgement on this and maximise integration with the western world.<br /><br />-- Sun Jul 25, 2010 3:05 pm --<br /><br />
Damocles said:
MaineDAWG2008 said:
These people arent bright? hmmm as bright as your post might sound!

NULL!

He's saying that terrorists aren't bright, not Muslims, stop being so touchy.

Apologies
 
stonerblue said:
PistonBlue said:
No, not a security issue at all. Who's scared of a shy little woman?

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/06/female-suicide-bomber-murders-two-us-soldiers-in-afghanistan-with-bomb-hidden-beneath-her-burqa.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/06/femal ... burqa.html</a>

lovely little website that.

Ironically, if she'd have dressed in western clothes then she would have been probably been spotted.


if she had of been wearing "western clothes" then CCTV would have been able to stop her/him/them and possibly flag them up before they did attack. Or even after they had done it, use CCTV to use in the investigation that follows.
 
rickmcfc said:
stonerblue said:
lovely little website that.

Ironically, if she'd have dressed in western clothes then she would have been probably been spotted.


if she had of been wearing "western clothes" then CCTV would have been able to stop her/him/them and possibly flag them up before they did attack. Or even after they had done it, use CCTV to use in the investigation that follows.

That would probably be relevant, if they even had CCTV in a desert road checkpoint manned by a couple of soldiers hey? Also, the fact that she was a woman means that she wouldn't have been searched anyway. Unless she was wearing a the detonation equipment on the end of her nose, that story has nothing to do with anything.

Anyway, the argument was never about whether it's possible to do so, of course it is; the argument is whether it's probable. I don't know about you, but I refuse to walk around worrying about improbable stuff that might happen, and I'm certainly not going to vote any laws against it. You know, it's entirely possible that all Muslims are part of an underground movement to radicalise the faiths against each other to produce the next World War. Should be therefore ban all religions because it's possible? No, because it's improbable.
 
Damocles said:
rickmcfc said:
if she had of been wearing "western clothes" then CCTV would have been able to stop her/him/them and possibly flag them up before they did attack. Or even after they had done it, use CCTV to use in the investigation that follows.

That would probably be relevant, if they even had CCTV in a desert road checkpoint manned by a couple of soldiers hey? Also, the fact that she was a woman means that she wouldn't have been searched anyway. Unless she was wearing a the detonation equipment on the end of her nose, that story has nothing to do with anything.

Anyway, the argument was never about whether it's possible to do so, of course it is; the argument is whether it's probable. I don't know about you, but I refuse to walk around worrying about improbable stuff that might happen, and I'm certainly not going to vote any laws against it. You know, it's entirely possible that all Muslims are part of an underground movement to radicalise the faiths against each other to produce the next World War. Should be therefore ban all religions because it's possible? No, because it's improbable.

What the hell are you on about. We live in England, there are no desert roads or checkpoints, but we live in the CCTV capital of the world where all the town streets are covered, so yes she would have been spotted. And whats this tripe about "women cant be searched"? Of course they can, by another woman of course, of are we " inflicting their human rights" by doing this? just like every irishman was frowned upon walking the streets on the UK in the late 80-90's, i certainly look this way at muslims who are covered from head to toe all in black, thats just the way it is, tough, live with it. The quicker they ban the Burka then i and a lot of other people will feel safer. If than offends them then so be it. I get offended when i walk into a shop and there are asians who will start to talk in another language, even though they can speak perfect english, just a rude bunch of fuckers, not all of them i must add, but a large proportion.
 
The whole ethos of these items of clothing is the degradation of women and to highlight their submissive position within society.

Our culture denotes equality, therefore any woman who feels the need to condone that should, quite frankly, fuck off to a society where it is deemed acceptable.
 
Firstly, I was talking about the fact that if that suicide bomber wasn't wearing a burqa, the incident would have still happened.

Secondly, you've just given the game away. Like all other BNP members I've come across, especially the big "I'm a hardman" ones, when it comes down to it, you're just a coward. This isn't about patriotism, or social norms or British culture, or any of the other shit that you guys use to justify it, it comes down to the fact that you're scared of life. You're scared of highly religious, docile women may attack you. You're scared that people who talk in other languages around you, do it because you are there. You're scared that a new culture will come into play and you'll be swept aside as a useless member of society. You're scared of people moving into your area because your happy life will change and these people will just bring bad influences. You want life to stop, to stand still whilst you live it out.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.