Is it true Aguero can't be banned? (Update P43)

[BlueBas]

What will the agenda merchants make of that then?

Obviously it's an attempt by FA to undermine City for the FA cup by ensuring Kun is not rested for 3 games! (Personally, I would have been interested to see if Mancini would have given Guidetti an opportunity in the run in if Kun had been banned).

 

[NQCitizen]

Guess the FA have realised what we've known since May:

Sergio Aguero can do no wrong.

 

[nehe11]

A bit suprised or maybe I shoulden´t be with Macmanaman getting of the hook after nearly breaking the Newcastle lad legs, nonetheless I´m happy with the decision.

 

[SamCity123]

He has clearly entertained them too much for them to produce any ban!

The party continues.

 

[NorCalBlue]

What will the agenda merchants make of that then?

I can tell you haven't spent much time studying the people who think 9/11 was an inside job, or that the moon landings were staged in Hollywood - evidence that suggests there's no agenda is simply evidence of an agenda cover-up. Why would they let Aguero off when he so clearly should have got a 3 game ban unless they're trying to hide something...?

 

[Bill]

they had no choice once they let that wigan guy off.

 

[Cheadle Blue]

The rag infested daily star now has a web story "fans mystified as FA decides not too punish aguero for 2 footed stamp"

hehehehehehehehe

 

[adrianr]

Chelsea will be well happy with that. That's an astonishing decision though. Just like Macmanananamanan. Highlights how useless their retrospective punishment system is.

 

[Blue Mist]

Is it true that the F.A. have not charged Kun but have banned Mario instead ?

 

[adrianr]

Is it true that the F.A. have not charged Kun but have banned Mario instead ?

Hahaha.