SOUTHSTANDINGSTANDER
Well-Known Member
This thread if F*cking hilarious!
Note: I used the capital "F" for effect. That is all.
Note: I used the capital "F" for effect. That is all.
Davs 19 said:bobmcfc said:Davs 19 said:+ 1 & bring in Jovetic.
I want heskey
I doubt we/you could afford him. Prolific hit men like Emile come with a price ;.)
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:Dortmund home+no Tevez=wank
Ajax away+no Tevez=wank
Mathmatical Formula proves Tevez=solution
BoyBlue_1985 said:
lizzkyk said:fatbloke said:Didsbury Dave said:Tevez is an exceptional player, but there's a grain of truth in your post. One of the reasons why our play became so scintillating at the start of last season was that we suddenly started playing pass and move, one and two touch football, breaking and attacking at pace. Everything was going through silva, aguero and that was the way we overpowered teams. Watch the 6-1 and you'll see it, possession and penetration, the opposition chasing shadows. One and two touch fast football. It was partly because we had no Tevez slowing things up.
With Tevez it's all or nothing. He can score some brilliant solo goals and he works his bollocks off. But his natural game is not one touch pass and move. He receives the ball and often runs at people. Sometimes it comes off and he creates himself or someone else a chance. Sometimes it doesn't and he loses possession. He's a better player than nasri, and brings a lot more to the table, but like nasri he loses us something as well. Fluency and speed. When both of them are in the team you get what we got on Tuesday and at west ham: lots of possession but slower build up player and less razor sharp penetration.
It's a conundrum because I believe he and Aguero are our best strikers. He gets goals. But he does affect us too and in some ways nullifies what can be our biggest weapon.
I completely agree, Tevez whilst being a world class individual player ruins the fluidity of the team. Our problem is that Aguero and Tevez do not work together and I don't care what anyone says, Aguero when fit starts. Yes people will point to the West Brom and Norwich games at the end of last season but that's two solitary games, since those two games we haven't played well and in the games they have played together I haven't seen one bit of link up between the pair (one ball through in pre-season if I remember correctly).
With Tevez in the team we don't score team goals, they're all individual goals or set pieces and it's because he doesn't play with any intelligence. By that I mean he plays like a schoolboy who thinks he's the best player in the team so just puts his head down and tries to win the game on his own. In terms of dribbling, strength, fighting spirit, chasing defenders down and finishing you cannot say a bad word about Tevez. You can't knock his effort and commitment either but his lack of awareness and vision stifles us especially as our whole attacking philosophy is based on that passing and movement. It makes him look like a superstar but to the detriment of the team as a whole. While his individual talent may win you the odd game like Swansea, it's teams that win leagues titles and we look a better team when Tevez isn't playing in my mind.
do you think aguero dzeko have a better understanding? agueros been poor so far, but i beliebe once silva is back [on top form] him and tevez will start scoring more goals. ----
sbm said:Just before the 2011 Cup Final, I posted on here about the disgraceful way that Tevez had systematically frozen out the newly-arrived Dzeko. Using the Guardian Chalkboard, I counted just half a dozen completed Tevez passes to Dzeko IN TOTAL in the premier league games against Wolves, Birmingham, Manchester United, West Brom, Fulham and Liverpool (whereas Dzeko had 6 completed passes to Tevez just in the Fulham game).
Sadly the Guardian Chalkboard has been discontinued. I have, however, watched recordings of a couple of recent matches specifically to count Tevez passes. Obviously, T = Tevez; A = Aguero; D = Dzeko; B = Balotelli.
Swansea
T and A started, with A being substituted after 95 minutes. B came on for the second half.
Leaving aside the 9 inch pass to kick off the match, T completed 1 pass to A in the first half and 4 passes to A in the second half.
T completed 0 (zero) passes to B. Notably, in the 99th minute, T had a feeble shot when he should have made a simple pass to B who was clear. However, if it is any consolation, T did not ignore B entirely: he tripped B up in the 75th minute!
For completeness, A made 6 passes to T and 1 to B. B completed 1 pass to A.
Ajax
T and A started; B came on for the second half; D replaced T after 65 minutes.
In the First Half, T completed 1 pass to A; in the Second Half, playing deeper and as a 'playmaker' (???), T completed 1 pass to A and 0 (zero) passes to B.
As to the passes by / to other strikers:
A to T: 3; B to A: 5; A to B: 2; A to D: 1; D to A: 1; B to D: 1; D to B: 3.
The above includes B's header to A resulting in our 2nd goal; I have also included as 'completed' D's header to B, which the latter had chested down before being yanked off the ball.
NB. The above stats are offered in good faith but could be inaccurate! It is not always easy on TV to distinguish players. Also, Swansea and Ajax were such disappointing matches that it was easy to lose concentration and to forget what I was supposed to be doing.
Real Madrid
Dzeko had scored in the 69th minute. In the 71st minute, we had a break with Tevez on the ball. Dzeko was clear on his right and a player of Tevez skill could have put a through-ball giving Dzeko at least as a good a chance (on his right foot) as he had just converted (with his left). Instead, he opted for a pass left to Kolarov expecting that the latter would provide a centre for himself to score. It came to nothing. That decision by Tevez (to not pass to Dzeko) could well be a decisive moment in City's season (and in Mancini's managerial career at City). Had we gone 2 goals up in 3 minutes....
(My son did suggest at the time that Silva would have passed to Dzeko and that perhaps Tevez did not pass to Dzeko because Tevez is weak with his left foot. After all, according to transfermarkt. co.uk, Tevez has only scored 5 goals with his left foot in his entire CAREER. But I reckon he could have managed a through-ball with either foot.)
Argentina
It is no coincidence that Argentina - and Messi - are doing better with Tevez out of the picture. On the "great natural understanding" between Messi and Aguero, see:
http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/10/19/even-the-most-ardent-of-the-anti-messi-gang-have-abandoned-their-mistaken-stance/
TEVEZ COMPETES WITH FELLOW STRIKERS. Normally he passes to them either only as a last resort or on the understanding that they will pass back to him (as in the first of his 2 passes to Aguero in the 65 minutes they were both on the field in the Ajax game).
My main concern for this season has been, and still is, that Aguero will be 'sidelined' by Tevez - and that pundits will continue to drool over Tevez ("he always gives 110%") and (with the possible exception of Gary Neville) they will express bewilderment as to why Aguero seems less effective than in his first season in the premier league. It is also clear from the first 8 pages that many City fans need to wake up to the real Tevez. Sadly, after defending Mancini many times on here, I have to say that he is befuddled (and / or intimidated) when it comes to Tevez.
Last but not least, someone who has worked out how to use MCFCAnalytics properly could do the Club a HUGE favour by providing the relevant people at the Club with a comprehensive analysis of Tevez passes to fellow strikers. The sort of analysis I have in mind would be along the lines of the following (amended to focus on the issues posed above and to encompass more than one game):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/interactive/2012/oct/15/football-performance-analysis-chalkboards-radial-passing-manchester-city