Isco

[adrianr]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

Could be bollocks, could be a briefing.

Bollocks, there has been no briefing.

Which is why most of the nationals and Manchester No.1s have not even mentioned it this morning.

The MEN didn't even have the bollocks to put a by line on the back page of the piece, probably because Stuart doesn't want to make a rod for his own back, fair play!

In the first three paragraphs the MEN uses the words, understood, believe, set to and reportedly.

I'll give you a fecking briefing, City are as tight as a fecking drum on this and that tells me one of two things...

As I was told yesterday, it was not over...

And....we're just a shot away ;)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_a0zOLMAfw[/youtube]



P.S - I'm on Wimbledon duty this week so on when I can.

Much better way to start the day, cheers Tolm!

 

[Blumers Bloomers]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

Could be bollocks, could be a briefing.

Bollocks, there has been no briefing.

Which is why most of the nationals and Manchester No.1s have not even mentioned it this morning.

The MEN didn't even have the bollocks to put a by line on the back page of the piece, probably because Stuart doesn't want to make a rod for his own back, fair play!

In the first three paragraphs the MEN uses the words, understood, believe, set to and reportedly.

I'll give you a fecking briefing, City are as tight as a fecking drum on this and that tells me one of two things...

As I was told yesterday, it was not over...

And....we're just a shot away ;)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_a0zOLMAfw[/youtube]



P.S - I'm on Wimbledon duty this week so on when I can.

Ballboy? :)

 

[Project]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

The MEN using the anti Madridista stuff posted in here simply suggests a round up article and guesswork after trawling the web, not a briefing.

 

[Jumanji]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

9am Monday morning? Doubt anyone briefed him but who knows..

 

[lost_n_spaced]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

And with that you look quite silly.

See above.

It's a group of mates as well as a forum.

What they don't need are the type of zealots/idiots who will add 300 pages just because of the latest twitter nonsense.

That#s what here is for (let's face facts, even the main Bluemoon forum don#t want you, which is why they have a separate transfer forum).

Why are you on this forum then? You criticise people for posting 'twitter nonsense,' then you post something one of your 'group of friends' on another forum has claimed. Ironic really.

OK, for the cheap seats.

I come HERE for transfer nonsense, which is precisely why I don't want people from HERE going THERE because then there would be no point in me coming HERE.

The person THERE who originally posted what I re-posted HERE is a good friend of 'said first-teamer' and hasn't just clicked the follow him link because his name sounds foreign or he saw a retweet.

Clear enough ?

 

[burning blue soul]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

What a thread. I'm due to have a minor opp today, hope I don't miss anything ;-)

no worries, we will wait for you!!!

 

[robbieh]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

All signs in the media, British ones aswell now, are that he is going to Madrid. Can they all be completely wrong and our ITK's know better?

Fingers crossed, but I can't see it.

I'm sure City have will be moving on to plan b's very soon.

Our esteemed ITKs have been very bold and vocal on this one. I would go as far as saying they have put their necks on the block.

 

[Claytop]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

Could be bollocks, could be a briefing.

Bollocks, there has been no briefing.

Which is why most of the nationals and Manchester No.1s have not even mentioned it this morning.

The MEN didn't even have the bollocks to put a by line on the back page of the piece, probably because Stuart doesn't want to make a rod for his own back, fair play!

In the first three paragraphs the MEN uses the words, understood, believe, set to and reportedly.

I'll give you a fecking briefing, City are as tight as a fecking drum on this and that tells me one of two things...

As I was told yesterday, it was not over...

And....we're just a shot away ;)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_a0zOLMAfw[/youtube]



P.S - I'm on Wimbledon duty this week so on when I can.

And with that post BM collectively breathes again, Madrid and the media over there are clearly a set of t**ts. You know what.. I'd love it if we signed him, just love it.

 

[Nixon_The_Bike_Thief]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

Update from ITK poster refered to earlier :

'In all seriousity Vibe, I was txted by a mate who I have no reason to doubt and all it said was 'you'll be happy Tuesday'. He works at City. It was not JM either.

I guessed he meant Isco, but maybe we have other plans. One thing in their credit is that EWS have been quite discrete about the purchases so far. '


Note : I have no idea what EWS stands for.

hmm okay well i searched part of that quote on google and the only relevant link that came up was this forum.

can you not just give us the link for the forum? if the 'ITK' didnt want people to hear his info then he wouldnt have posted it.

They are a more discerning forum.

They don't want your types on there.

:D

Do you speak to Rascal on there as well by any chance ?

 

[Stoned Rose]

Re: Isco (Part 8 (weekend saga part 3))

See above.

It's a group of mates as well as a forum.

What they don't need are the type of zealots/idiots who will add 300 pages just because of the latest twitter nonsense.

That#s what here is for (let's face facts, even the main Bluemoon forum don#t want you, which is why they have a separate transfer forum).

Why are you on this forum then? You criticise people for posting 'twitter nonsense,' then you post something one of your 'group of friends' on another forum has claimed. Ironic really.

OK, for the cheap seats.

I come HERE for transfer nonsense, which is precisely why I don't want people from HERE going THERE because then there would be no point in me coming HERE.

The person THERE who originally posted what I re-posted HERE is a good friend of 'said first-teamer' and hasn't just clicked the follow him link because his name sounds foreign or he saw a retweet.

Clear enough ?

Dead clear for us plebs yeah.