Isco

blueparrot said:
NipHolmes said:
avoidconfusion said:
Makes you wonder why the fuck we happily splashed a reported 40m € on Fernandinho but refuse to cough up the money for Isco


I think City have the hump about paying an extra load of cash when Isco re-signed a deal with new clause that was only offered to lift the fee of the player for re-sale. Cavani and Isco both had new contracts when our interest was known. I think it's not co-incidental we ask for lower fees than release clauses.

-- Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:09 pm --

Marvin said:
Even City have a budget, and it's pretty obvious that the main priority must be a forward.

Every time we buy a player, the cry is you paid over the odds. Maybe City are negotiating to keep the fee down. A transfer negotiation, who'd have thought it

3 players targeted, we over pay for 1 and it puts the move of one of the other 2 at risk.

Don't know that we did pay over but I do know we needed Fernandinho more than we need Isco

Fernandinho miles more needed than Isco.
 
avoidconfusion said:
salfordpaul said:
avoidconfusion said:
Tolmie, salfordpaul etc are a bit quiet....

i'm on holiday pal, not interested if i'm honest, hope we can bag him but he wont make a mega difference! we NEED a striker!


Cheers mate, dunno why everyone was having a go at me then for my comment. Was just a bit worried that the few people who obviously know stuff like you got so quiet...worried because to me that indicated that Madrid got him that`s all


made me piss myself,all the madrid based media shit printed made you believe theyd got him, and when people who know stuff here say nothing that makes you think theyve got him as well?
 
Hugo Canizarès ‏@HugoTheInsider 12 m
@isco_alarcon to Man City is still on, but the odds tipping in Madrids favour. City looking at alternatives #Isco #MCFC #RM


This popped up at my newsfeed. Another so-called ITK, this was his first tweet. One follower. Get your tatoos ready
 
Wtf is this thread? Its like those furry star trek things.

I read one page and then 3 more appear! Ive been trying to catch up since Saturday.
 
Stoned Rose said:
blueparrot said:
NipHolmes said:
I think City have the hump about paying an extra load of cash when Isco re-signed a deal with new clause that was only offered to lift the fee of the player for re-sale. Cavani and Isco both had new contracts when our interest was known. I think it's not co-incidental we ask for lower fees than release clauses.

-- Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:09 pm --



3 players targeted, we over pay for 1 and it puts the move of one of the other 2 at risk.

Don't know that we did pay over but I do know we needed Fernandinho more than we need Isco

Fernandinho miles more needed than Isco.

Agree pal. A foil, and a rest for Yaya when required.
 
Jack74 said:
NipHolmes said:
Jack74 said:
Yeah he is better than there players but last year he was awful played well at Arsenal away last year


No he wasn't awful. Define awful please!

He was shit did fuck all season champions league was out of depth, played well at Arsenal away they had 10 men 4 85 mins and played ok at Old Trafford the rest of the big games he did fuck all

Comparing him 2 Xavi and Insista ha ha don't me laugh btw am not sayin u did

He had a poor season in my opinion, but what I will say , he was the best player on the pitch by a country mile when we played Madrid about gaff.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.