Isco

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

[bigimg]http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BNjeQvJCMAEXkiK.jpg:large[/bigimg]

Fucking hate tennis.

 

[DiscoSteve]

we can't lose!

get him and hey we beat RM to him - what a coup.
don't get him and we've saved a fortune on an unproven youngster which we can spend on a decent striker

 

[mauriziogaudino]

Rafael Hernández ‏@RafaelH117 1m
Things stay the same, Isco wants MCFC, agreed terms with both teams, but Málaga only has a deal with Real Madrid


if this is true why the fuck we don't want to pay another milions to get him????????????????????????WHY???????????????????????? someone need to responde for that if it's true

Totally baffling if true,

This same 'ITK' said the other day that there was no other option for the lad. We are not fucking stupid, we will be signing him or an other. The boys who now control our club will spend the dough and better is, as they already have done with the two they've brought in. Get a grip boys :)

 

[blueparrot]

@RafaelH117 Its bizarre,that's why I think there is more to come. I want this guy at City more than anyone.

Rafael Hernández Rafael Hernández ‏@RafaelH117 5m

@coolandthegangs Yes, what I can guarantee is that Isco hasn't sign with RMA yet, only agreed terms and signing without a counter bid.

Rafael Hernández ‏@RafaelH117 31m

@adlan_suzanne Nope, I said he was set to join after the U21s, MCFC lowered the bid, Real Madrid took their chances, that's what I said.


@adlan_suzanne Still, MCFC can still sign Isco, but club unwilling to pay the release clause. Málaga Owner favors selling the player to other spanish club.

-------------

If this is true then it makes you wonder what the f**k City are playing at.

Makes you wonder why the fuck we happily splashed a reported 40m € on Fernandinho but refuse to cough up the money for Isco

I think City have the hump about paying an extra load of cash when Isco re-signed a deal with new clause that was only offered to lift the fee of the player for re-sale. Cavani and Isco both had new contracts when our interest was known. I think it's not co-incidental we ask for lower fees than release clauses.

-- Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:09 pm --

Not crazy at all, or perhaps they don't think he is worth that much, it's hard getting some people to understand, if they want a player they will pay the price, but they will not overpay, far to many people playing fantasy football

Even City have a budget, and it's pretty obvious that the main priority must be a forward.

Every time we buy a player, the cry is you paid over the odds. Maybe City are negotiating to keep the fee down. A transfer negotiation, who'd have thought it

3 players targeted, we over pay for 1 and it puts the move of one of the other 2 at risk.

Don't know that we did pay over but I do know we needed Fernandinho more than we need Isco

 

[dum spiro spero]

My thoughts exactly. Malaga want more off us at a guess hence why we not happy.

Can hardly blame them- we take there manager and now we want there star player

We didn't want to pay Pellegrini's €4m compensation, so we held out a month activating a clause which forced Malaga to pay it.

The wierd thing is Malaga owed Pellegrini wages but it looks like their owner did not see it like that.

Either way it's not good for us trying to create a relationship with Malaga with us hoping to sign their star player within weeks of getting their manager, maybe Malaga want their €4m back on top of the fee???

We loaned them Santa Cruz, what more do they want?

 

[blue12]

Think it's obvious that ffp is having an effect on what we are prepared to pay for players,ffp hey what a load of bollocks a ruling where clubs 100s of millions in debt can spend what they want yet a club debt free cant.
Utter utter fucking nonsense fair play has fuck all to do with it.

 

[IanBishopsHaircut]

We have plenty of midfield talent

What I'm more concerned about is if Tevez goes..who the fuck are we gonna replace him with?!

 

[dref619]

How is he?

Because of a single half decent season? Because he did well at the under 21 tournament? Romeu at Chelsea was great at youth level, look at how he's developed at Chelsea since coming here.

Nasri is miles more proven at the moment.

His performances in the champions league show how good isco is in my opinion . You can count the number of performances Nasri has had like that on one hand unfortunately

Yes But maybe Pelligrini got those performances out of him and can do the same for Nasri and Silva

Maybe he might, and I expect David Silva to have a very good season next season , just have my continuing doubts about Nasri. If he can make Nasri run through walls for him like he has done with other players in the past apparently, then Pellegrini will be a god, because I don't think Nasri could run through a paper bag.

 

[Davs 19]

@RafaelH117 Its bizarre,that's why I think there is more to come. I want this guy at City more than anyone.

Rafael Hernández Rafael Hernández ‏@RafaelH117 5m

@coolandthegangs Yes, what I can guarantee is that Isco hasn't sign with RMA yet, only agreed terms and signing without a counter bid.

Rafael Hernández ‏@RafaelH117 31m

@adlan_suzanne Nope, I said he was set to join after the U21s, MCFC lowered the bid, Real Madrid took their chances, that's what I said.


@adlan_suzanne Still, MCFC can still sign Isco, but club unwilling to pay the release clause. Málaga Owner favors selling the player to other spanish club.

-------------

If this is true then it makes you wonder what the f**k City are playing at.

Makes you wonder why the fuck we happily splashed a reported 40m € on Fernandinho but refuse to cough up the money for Isco

I think City have the hump about paying an extra load of cash when Isco re-signed a deal with new clause that was only offered to lift the fee of the player for re-sale. Cavani and Isco both had new contracts when our interest was known. I think it's not co-incidental we ask for lower fees than release clauses.

-- Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:09 pm --

Not crazy at all, or perhaps they don't think he is worth that much, it's hard getting some people to understand, if they want a player they will pay the price, but they will not overpay, far to many people playing fantasy football

Even City have a budget, and it's pretty obvious that the main priority must be a forward.

Every time we buy a player, the cry is you paid over the odds. Maybe City are negotiating to keep the fee down. A transfer negotiation, who'd have thought it

3 players targeted, we over pay for 1 and it puts the move of one of the other 2 at risk.

We've signed 2. Did we not target both of those ?

 

[Jack74]

He certainly wasn't on form or anywhere near it. He was burned out, played out of position (his best is through the middle rather than to the left). The season before I base my judgement as that's the player he is imho.

Garbage? Bit harsh, he buys and sells anyone over the road ;)

Yeah he is better than there players but last year he was awful played well at Arsenal away last year

No he wasn't awful. Define awful please!

He was shit did fuck all season champions league was out of depth, played well at Arsenal away they had 10 men 4 85 mins and played ok at Old Trafford the rest of the big games he did fuck all

Comparing him 2 Xavi and Insista ha ha don't me laugh btw am not sayin u did