You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Isco
- Thread starter Rammy Blue
- Start date
carlosthejackal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 4,475
MCFCBen said:Ray78 said:I can't believe what I am reading regarding David Silva.
This.
He's our most important player. Mould the team round him, allow him the space to roam and watch him tear up the league again next season!
Yaya Fernandinho
Navas Silva (Isco)Nasri
Aguero
Boom!
When did we sign boom???
mscenterh750
Well-Known Member
Sorry John, I couldn't help myself after seeing the advert, on the back of the star. Let's just call it an interlude.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
DiscoSteve said:Is Neymar still available? He looked not bad last week...
Signed for Barca pal
super_city_si said:Wtf is this thread? Its like those furry star trek things.
I read one page and then 3 more appear! Ive been trying to catch up since Saturday.
Ditto! So stop bloody posting then....shit, now you've got me at it
Rammyblues
Well-Known Member
My opinion that is all:-
1) Pellegrini principal targets were Fernandhino and Navas that is why we paid the price these were the missing pieces for the squad identified by the "board" no doubt ably assisted by our new manager.
2) It is probably true that Isco would come to City
3) To sooth the RMs fans given the earlier article he is then reported to have made positive comments about RM
4) RM and Malaga are in agreement
5) Isco 's reps and RM are in agreement
6) If we match RMs offer the player comes to us
7) We obviously had an understanding with Malaga regarding a lower fee
8) When RM launched their bid everything changed
9) It seems to me we have asked Isco to be patient
10) Not sure how patient he will be but it seems this week by Wednesday is the deadline
11) Brinkmanship and negotiations are obviously part and part of this deal, do Malaga send Isco to a club where deep down he doesn't want to go, thereby betraying the fans who have supported him, or does he publicly comes out and says I want City thereby weakening Malagas hand in the negotiation and thereby leaving a sour taste in his mouth when it seems he wants the best for Malaga as well.
12) It seems that we are at stalemate, the easiest option is for the lad to join RM and I am almost sure that will happen, Perez has cleared the way in that respect by announcing he is excited about us (RM) and we want him.
13) The amount we pay on him may impact our other targets, is he really what we need given the squad we have.
14) Unless we are allowed further financial flexibility in this deal then my head says he will probably have to go to RM, I hope I am wrong.
1) Pellegrini principal targets were Fernandhino and Navas that is why we paid the price these were the missing pieces for the squad identified by the "board" no doubt ably assisted by our new manager.
2) It is probably true that Isco would come to City
3) To sooth the RMs fans given the earlier article he is then reported to have made positive comments about RM
4) RM and Malaga are in agreement
5) Isco 's reps and RM are in agreement
6) If we match RMs offer the player comes to us
7) We obviously had an understanding with Malaga regarding a lower fee
8) When RM launched their bid everything changed
9) It seems to me we have asked Isco to be patient
10) Not sure how patient he will be but it seems this week by Wednesday is the deadline
11) Brinkmanship and negotiations are obviously part and part of this deal, do Malaga send Isco to a club where deep down he doesn't want to go, thereby betraying the fans who have supported him, or does he publicly comes out and says I want City thereby weakening Malagas hand in the negotiation and thereby leaving a sour taste in his mouth when it seems he wants the best for Malaga as well.
12) It seems that we are at stalemate, the easiest option is for the lad to join RM and I am almost sure that will happen, Perez has cleared the way in that respect by announcing he is excited about us (RM) and we want him.
13) The amount we pay on him may impact our other targets, is he really what we need given the squad we have.
14) Unless we are allowed further financial flexibility in this deal then my head says he will probably have to go to RM, I hope I am wrong.
Lark Lane Blue
Well-Known Member
jrb said:Sorry my head is f***ed.
Apart from PB, TH and SP, who else is has got some form of ITK status on BM.
I'm not sure but I think you just set a new forum record for most abbreviations in a post.
dannybcity
Well-Known Member
M24 Citizen said:dannybcity said:M24 Citizen said:Proven to not care about the shirt he plays in.
Are you saying Nasri doesn't care whether we win or not?
Not enough. Otherwise you would see a surge in effort when we're not winning.
How exactly would we see a surge in effort? He tries as hard as anyone, just because he's not flying into tackles or screaming at the ref doesn't mean he's not trying. I really wish people would get over his part in Van Persies free kick.
You lucky one!tolmie's hairdoo said:Cosmin said:So no news?tolmie's hairdoo said:I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.
Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?
Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.
In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.
Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?
The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.
Exactly that. Nothing out of City and no briefings.
Going in to a fifth day now since Marca wrote all signed.
Maria Sharapova has that ability to make you forget all about football!