Isco

tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.

Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?

Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.

In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.

Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?

The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.

Good to have someone with information back rather than a gif of a dancing cat!
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.

Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?

Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.

In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.

Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?

The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.

Just kids spitting out dummies.
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.

Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?

Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.

In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.

Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?

The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.

Fuck em Tolm.

Has the 'decision' been made yet then bro?
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.

Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?

Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.

In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.

Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?

The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.


Glad to have you posting again bud, please ignore the haters.

Can you please put some order to this chaos? Is it true that City haven't even put in an official bid/offer to Malaga and that's the reason we're going to miss out?
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.

Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?

Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.

In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.

Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?

The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.

So you are still claiming to be Batman?! :)
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.

Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?

Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.

In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.

Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?

The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.

Do you have any news Tolmie or is it dead in the water?
 
Stoned Rose said:
blueparrot said:
NipHolmes said:
I think City have the hump about paying an extra load of cash when Isco re-signed a deal with new clause that was only offered to lift the fee of the player for re-sale. Cavani and Isco both had new contracts when our interest was known. I think it's not co-incidental we ask for lower fees than release clauses.

-- Mon Jun 24, 2013 10:09 pm --



3 players targeted, we over pay for 1 and it puts the move of one of the other 2 at risk.

Don't know that we did pay over but I do know we needed Fernandinho more than we need Isco

Fernandinho miles more needed than Isco.

we only payed 22mill for fernandinho but because the shit anti city media say it was 34mill everyone believes it, the same media were reporting that we payed 22mill for navas also until the sevilla president said it was 14.9mill. we did not overpay
 
TonyM said:
Offer 20m and not a penny more other than Silva, Nasri and Yaya.

Leaves an XI of...
...................Hart...............
Richards Kompany Lescott Clichy
........Fernandinho Barry.....
...Navas ....Rodwell ......Isco
.............Aguero Dzeko....

Easy!

4-2-3-2

Would win most leagues.......
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.