Isco

Sorry my head is f***ed.

Apart from PB, TH and SP, who else is has got some form of ITK status on BM.
 
Cosmin said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.

Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?

Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.

In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.

Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?

The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.
So no news?
That's his take

There's another aspect......the deal with Malaga. According to some we don't have one
 
Marvin said:
Ducado said:
Don Howe said:
Here's an idea, and it's pretty crazy, but maybe City havent met the release clause as they don't think it's worth spending that much money on an area of the team that doesn't need strengthening, and might prefer to spend it elsewhere now that the team adheres to FFP rules


Crazy, I know.

Not crazy at all, or perhaps they don't think he is worth that much, it's hard getting some people to understand, if they want a player they will pay the price, but they will not overpay, far to many people playing fantasy football
Even City have a budget, and it's pretty obvious that the main priority must be a forward.

Every time we buy a player, the cry is you paid over the odds. Maybe City are negotiating to keep the fee down. A transfer negotiation, who'd have thought it


Guess the club are damned if they do and damned if they don't - as far as some fans are concerned. Personally, I'm happy to leave the decisions to the club - I'm sure they know what they are doing
 
g180aj said:
Stoned Rose said:
blueparrot said:
Don't know that we did pay over but I do know we needed Fernandinho more than we need Isco

Fernandinho miles more needed than Isco.

we only payed 22mill for fernandinho but because the shit anti city media say it was 34mill everyone believes it, the same media were reporting that we payed 22mill for navas also until the sevilla president said it was 14.9mill. we did not overpay

Shaktar official statement said 40m. This is thought to be potential final cost though if all add ons met
 
MCFCBen said:
TonyM said:
Offer 20m and not a penny more other than Silva, Nasri and Yaya.

Leaves an XI of...
...................Hart...............
Richards Kompany Lescott Clichy
........Fernandinho Barry.....
...Navas ....Rodwell ......Isco
.............Aguero Dzeko....

Easy!

4-2-3-2

Would win most leagues.......
Dzeko just strayed onto the pitch. He doesn't like being sub.
 
Cosmin said:
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm sorry, working most of the day, so not kept up with this thread.

Forgive me, but what have I supposedly said, or has someone been claiming fake PMs again?

Posted just the once early doors, and that was to refute City had briefed the MEN or any other news outlet.

In addition, that City had not given up yesterday and Pellegrini was attempting to speak direct with Isco.

Having stated all along the decision was down to the player, and NOBODY could call it, I'm surprised to see I have somehow bucked a consensus?

The few facts I have posted have been entirely accurate.
So no news?


Exactly that. Nothing out of City and no briefings.

Going in to a fifth day now since Marca wrote all signed.

Maria Sharapova has that ability to make you forget all about football!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.