Isco

I don't like this at all. I mean it seems like the father is being persuaded on the Madrid move which will be a bad. In the end it comes down to the player, if he OKs the move to Madrid than that'd where he'll be. Will end up being a bad move if so as he's not a guaranteed starter at all on that squad as it sits
 
nedums noodles said:
where's this news come from that he's definitely not coming?...it was all looking rosy 3 hours ago when i last looked on here,

Propaganda machine in Madrid - make it look like they thought they had there man only for a last ditch play by evil city promising him dirty oil money beyond his wildest dreams to turn his head.

Gotta think positive ;)
 
When I last checked everyone was excited this was going to happen..

What has happened to changed everyone's minds?!

EDIT: Someone answered above me. Thanks berniethebusman.
 
John.des said:
Reus or Di Maria for me. Di Maria is more of a winger, Reus can be playing even as a second striker and both are very fast.

But Pellegrini should call Isco and tell him to come and thats it.

If its something like we didt pay that extra 2-3 m pounds I seriously lose faith in the City hierarchy. We pay easily tens of millions for Garcia, Sinclair, Rodwell, when they dont even have that huge potential and/or slow/injury prone players, and when we have some chance to get a real genius like Hazard or Isco who will be big part of their teams we back off and dont pay that.

For Isco I would even pay over the release clause lol.
For Fernandinho I wouldnt originally pay 30m pounds yet we did with 3-4 good years in him (in best case) and no resale value.

We wont sign di maria cos we have just signed navas for the same position.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.