Isco

Davs 19 said:
Ray78 said:
sam-caddick said:
Isco could be the difference in the Champions League.

We had big injuries around the time we played Barcelona and could have done with a player like Isco.

We have Jovetic fit and raring to go.

I'm a massive Jovetic fan but Isco is more in the Silva mould, not at his level just yet but may well be in the future. While none of us want to say it, Dave will need replacing, Isco could be just the boy. What better education than time with Dave. Sadly, I can't see it happening but I'd love to be wrong.....

Isco is very much a number ten but miles behind Silva at the minute (Silva is that good) but he would learn - and I like the plan for succession. However, on valance I agree with those who'd prefer to wait and try to get Reus next summer - he'd give us something completely different.
 
nmc said:
Davs 19 said:
Ray78 said:
We have Jovetic fit and raring to go.

I'm a massive Jovetic fan but Isco is more in the Silva mould, not at his level just yet but may well be in the future. While none of us want to say it, Dave will need replacing, Isco could be just the boy. What better education than time with Dave. Sadly, I can't see it happening but I'd love to be wrong.....

Isco is very much a number ten but miles behind Silva at the minute (Silva is that good) but he would learn - and I like the plan for succession. However, on valance I agree with those who'd prefer to wait and try to get Reus next summer - he'd give us something completely different.

I think Lopes has the potential to become our version of Reus.
 
sam-caddick said:
nmc said:
Davs 19 said:
I'm a massive Jovetic fan but Isco is more in the Silva mould, not at his level just yet but may well be in the future. While none of us want to say it, Dave will need replacing, Isco could be just the boy. What better education than time with Dave. Sadly, I can't see it happening but I'd love to be wrong.....

Isco is very much a number ten but miles behind Silva at the minute (Silva is that good) but he would learn - and I like the plan for succession. However, on valance I agree with those who'd prefer to wait and try to get Reus next summer - he'd give us something completely different.

I think Lopes has the potential to become our version of Reus.
He won't although I do think this loan move to Lille will do him the world of good.
 
Davs 19 said:
Ray78 said:
sam-caddick said:
Isco could be the difference in the Champions League.

We had big injuries around the time we played Barcelona and could have done with a player like Isco.

We have Jovetic fit and raring to go.

I'm a massive Jovetic fan but Isco is more in the Silva mould, not at his level just yet but may well be in the future. While none of us want to say it, Dave will need replacing, Isco could be just the boy. What better education than time with Dave. Sadly, I can't see it happening but I'd love to be wrong.....

I have my doubts that he would be a good signing this time around even if we may have to look to the future and replace Dave. The first choice of a replacement would be checking the progress of Marcos Lopes.
 
ColinLee said:
I'm no cynic said:
Ray78 said:
Another major issue which gets bypassed in threads like this is that given the expectation we are to sign Mangala, then we will have 19 registered overseas players on the books which means that to add Isco to the squad, three existing players will have to move on to include him in the Premier League, and an extra body will have to be omitted from the CL too. So given the problem of moving on unwanted homegrown players if only to get the wage bill down, then which of our elite group of overseas players should we be prepared to ditch, whilst keeping a balanced squad and also to keep this part of the wage bill down so as to accommodate a high earner like Isco?

It isn't easy and it just won't happen.
18 isn't it? Or have I missed someone? Richards & Sinclair are missing as I'm presuming they're history. Still too many of course.

1. Caballero
2. Zabaleta
3. Sagna
4. Kolarov
5. Demichelis
6. Kompany
7. Mangala(?)
8. Fernando
9. Garcia
10. Fernandinho
11. Nasri
12. Silva
13. Yaya
14. Navas
15. Jovetic
16. Aguero
17. Dzeko
18. Negredo

19. Hart HG
20. Wright HG
21. Clichy HG
22. Milner HG
23. Rodwell HG
24. Boyata CT
18 it is. Don't know where I got the extra man from, but the argument still holds good if we signed up Isco or A.N Other. Two of our existing overseas lads will have to be released, and make it three for CL purposes. Garcia would be the most likely omission, but who would the others be and would they be happy about it?
 
I'm no cynic said:
ColinLee said:
I'm no cynic said:
Another major issue which gets bypassed in threads like this is that given the expectation we are to sign Mangala, then we will have 19 registered overseas players on the books which means that to add Isco to the squad, three existing players will have to move on to include him in the Premier League, and an extra body will have to be omitted from the CL too. So given the problem of moving on unwanted homegrown players if only to get the wage bill down, then which of our elite group of overseas players should we be prepared to ditch, whilst keeping a balanced squad and also to keep this part of the wage bill down so as to accommodate a high earner like Isco?

It isn't easy and it just won't happen.
18 isn't it? Or have I missed someone? Richards & Sinclair are missing as I'm presuming they're history. Still too many of course.

1. Caballero
2. Zabaleta
3. Sagna
4. Kolarov
5. Demichelis
6. Kompany
7. Mangala(?)
8. Fernando
9. Garcia
10. Fernandinho
11. Nasri
12. Silva
13. Yaya
14. Navas
15. Jovetic
16. Aguero
17. Dzeko
18. Negredo

19. Hart HG
20. Wright HG
21. Clichy HG
22. Milner HG
23. Rodwell HG
24. Boyata CT
18 it is. Don't know where I got the extra man from, but the argument still holds good if we signed up Isco or A.N Other. Two of our existing overseas lads will have to be released, and make it three for CL purposes. Garcia would be the most likely omission, but who would the others be and would they be happy about it?

I think they count Zuculini
 
Can't see it.
When Mangala arrives we already have to get rid of one foreign player to comply with Premier League squad rules.
- Not Nastastic & Bruno Zuculinii as they are U21 so don't count.
- Probably Garcia
So if we get Isco someone else has to go. Who?
 
BlueAnorak said:
Can't see it.
When Mangala arrives we already have to get rid of one foreign player to comply with Premier League squad rules.
- Not Nastastic & Bruno Zuculinii as they are U21 so don't count.
- Probably Garcia
So if we get Isco someone else has to go. Who?

Negrado
 
johnmc said:
BlueAnorak said:
Can't see it.
When Mangala arrives we already have to get rid of one foreign player to comply with Premier League squad rules.
- Not Nastastic & Bruno Zuculinii as they are U21 so don't count.
- Probably Garcia
So if we get Isco someone else has to go. Who?

Negrado

Before his injury that would have been the most obvious answer. Now, I am not so sure. Who would buy an injured player who is set to miss 3 months?
 
bluechampion7891 said:
johnmc said:
BlueAnorak said:
Can't see it.
When Mangala arrives we already have to get rid of one foreign player to comply with Premier League squad rules.
- Not Nastastic & Bruno Zuculinii as they are U21 so don't count.
- Probably Garcia
So if we get Isco someone else has to go. Who?

Negrado

Before his injury that would have been the most obvious answer. Now, I am not so sure. Who would buy an injured player who is set to miss 3 months?

Sorry, I mean just to leave out of the champions league squad. I think you can resubmit your squad after the group stage but might be wrong.
 
I could see Garcia accepting not being put on the CL roster if you approached him the right way. He's got a baby daughter and a trophy wife - reality has probably hit him in the face. Simply playing for City is probably pretty advantageou$ to him. You guarantee his CL bonus and give him some other perks he might not create too much of a hassle over being left off the CL list for a year. He'll get plenty of run in the league and cups. Not unthinkable.
 
Given what we have do we really need Isco? It was clear last season that we needed to supplement 4 positions, 3 of which are sorted and the other seems to be well in hand.

We have a wealth of great attacking midfield options so why this mad urge to add to it? Its obviously nice to sign new players but not when theres no real point.
 
<a class="postlink" href="http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/07/21/rumoured-man-city-and-liverpool-target-not-interested-in-move-to/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/07/ ... n-move-to/</a>?

City and Liverpool target not interested in move to England

Real Madrid star had been linked with a move to Manchester City and Liverpool.

Real Madrid star Isco is not interested in a move away from the Bernabéu, according to a report in Marca.

The 22-year-old had been linked with a move to both Manchester City and Liverpool, but seemingly wants to stay and fight for his place in the Spanish capital.

Isco’s place in the team is under threat following reports that Madrid have signed Colombia star James Rodriguez. Recent acquisition Toni Kroos also joins Luka Modric and Angel Di Maria as attacking midfield options.

The young Spaniard was often used as a substitute last season, as Real went on to win their tenth European title. Despite his staggered starting appearances, Isco went on to score eleven times and assist eight goals in what was a decent first campaign.

Real Madrid snatched Isco from under the noses of Manchester City last summer, as many expected him to link up with his former manager at Malaga, Manuel Pellegrini. The link to the Chilean boss has again been talked about this summer with regard to Isco making a move to the Etihad, but this now seems unlikely.

Isco is one of 20 names that have been included for Real Madrid’s pre-season tour of the United States, with manager Carlo Ancelotti seemingly keen to keep him.

The Marca report claims Isco is unwilling to leave Madrid but implies that he could be turned should he feel his first team opportunities are becoming limited. But for now it seems as if the reported Manchester City and Liverpool target will fight for his place at the European Champions.
 
Falastur said:
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/07/21/rumoured-man-city-and-liverpool-target-not-interested-in-move-to/?

City and Liverpool target not interested in move to England

Real Madrid star had been linked with a move to Manchester City and Liverpool.

Real Madrid star Isco is not interested in a move away from the Bernabéu, according to a report in Marca.

The 22-year-old had been linked with a move to both Manchester City and Liverpool, but seemingly wants to stay and fight for his place in the Spanish capital.

Isco’s place in the team is under threat following reports that Madrid have signed Colombia star James Rodriguez. Recent acquisition Toni Kroos also joins Luka Modric and Angel Di Maria as attacking midfield options.

The young Spaniard was often used as a substitute last season, as Real went on to win their tenth European title. Despite his staggered starting appearances, Isco went on to score eleven times and assist eight goals in what was a decent first campaign.

Real Madrid snatched Isco from under the noses of Manchester City last summer, as many expected him to link up with his former manager at Malaga, Manuel Pellegrini. The link to the Chilean boss has again been talked about this summer with regard to Isco making a move to the Etihad, but this now seems unlikely.

Isco is one of 20 names that have been included for Real Madrid’s pre-season tour of the United States, with manager Carlo Ancelotti seemingly keen to keep him.

The Marca report claims Isco is unwilling to leave Madrid but implies that he could be turned should he feel his first team opportunities are becoming limited. But for now it seems as if the reported Manchester City and Liverpool target will fight for his place at the European Champions.

So given the last paragraph this means nothing
 
Falastur said:
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/07/21/rumoured-man-city-and-liverpool-target-not-interested-in-move-to/?

City and Liverpool target not interested in move to England

Real Madrid star had been linked with a move to Manchester City and Liverpool.

Real Madrid star Isco is not interested in a move away from the Bernabéu, according to a report in Marca.

The 22-year-old had been linked with a move to both Manchester City and Liverpool, but seemingly wants to stay and fight for his place in the Spanish capital.

Isco’s place in the team is under threat following reports that Madrid have signed Colombia star James Rodriguez. Recent acquisition Toni Kroos also joins Luka Modric and Angel Di Maria as attacking midfield options.

The young Spaniard was often used as a substitute last season, as Real went on to win their tenth European title. Despite his staggered starting appearances, Isco went on to score eleven times and assist eight goals in what was a decent first campaign.

Real Madrid snatched Isco from under the noses of Manchester City last summer, as many expected him to link up with his former manager at Malaga, Manuel Pellegrini. The link to the Chilean boss has again been talked about this summer with regard to Isco making a move to the Etihad, but this now seems unlikely.

Isco is one of 20 names that have been included for Real Madrid’s pre-season tour of the United States, with manager Carlo Ancelotti seemingly keen to keep him.

The Marca report claims Isco is unwilling to leave Madrid but implies that he could be turned should he feel his first team opportunities are becoming limited. But for now it seems as if the reported Manchester City and Liverpool target will fight for his place at the European Champions.
Real are a strange club where being a good footballer isn‘t enough. Michael Owen & Mesut Ozil found this to their cost.

If Madrid see James as a better looking and better player who'll not just contribute on the pitch, but also with selling shirts and the brand, Real have a track record of jettisoning the incumbent without so much as a cursory glance over their shoulder.

For Isco, see Ozil.
 
Dribble said:
Falastur said:
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/07/21/rumoured-man-city-and-liverpool-target-not-interested-in-move-to/?

City and Liverpool target not interested in move to England

Real Madrid star had been linked with a move to Manchester City and Liverpool.

Real Madrid star Isco is not interested in a move away from the Bernabéu, according to a report in Marca.

The 22-year-old had been linked with a move to both Manchester City and Liverpool, but seemingly wants to stay and fight for his place in the Spanish capital.

Isco’s place in the team is under threat following reports that Madrid have signed Colombia star James Rodriguez. Recent acquisition Toni Kroos also joins Luka Modric and Angel Di Maria as attacking midfield options.

The young Spaniard was often used as a substitute last season, as Real went on to win their tenth European title. Despite his staggered starting appearances, Isco went on to score eleven times and assist eight goals in what was a decent first campaign.

Real Madrid snatched Isco from under the noses of Manchester City last summer, as many expected him to link up with his former manager at Malaga, Manuel Pellegrini. The link to the Chilean boss has again been talked about this summer with regard to Isco making a move to the Etihad, but this now seems unlikely.

Isco is one of 20 names that have been included for Real Madrid’s pre-season tour of the United States, with manager Carlo Ancelotti seemingly keen to keep him.

The Marca report claims Isco is unwilling to leave Madrid but implies that he could be turned should he feel his first team opportunities are becoming limited. But for now it seems as if the reported Manchester City and Liverpool target will fight for his place at the European Champions.
Real are a strange club where being a good footballer isn‘t enough. Michael Owen & Mesut Ozil found this to their cost.

If Madrid see James as a better looking and better player who'll not just contribute on the pitch, but also with selling shirts and the brand, Real have a track record of jettisoning the incumbent without so much as a cursory glance over their shoulder.

For Isco, see Ozil.

Ozil was a regular first team starter for Madrid though? Silly comparison.
 
richball_PF55 said:
Dribble said:
Falastur said:
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/07/21/rumoured-man-city-and-liverpool-target-not-interested-in-move-to/?
Real are a strange club where being a good footballer isn‘t enough. Michael Owen & Mesut Ozil found this to their cost.

If Madrid see James as a better looking and better player who'll not just contribute on the pitch, but also with selling shirts and the brand, Real have a track record of jettisoning the incumbent without so much as a cursory glance over their shoulder.

For Isco, see Ozil.

Ozil was a regular first team starter for Madrid though? Silly comparison.

Actually makes his point. Ozil was in an even better position than Isco and was still sent packing. Like he says, at Real Madrid sometimes being a good footballer just isn't enough.
 
Madrid are all about signing players for the media/fan impact. If a players stock is high, they want them. As soon as they settle into the team and become forgotten about slightly, they send them packing. Isco is next. James Rodriguez won't be far behind, unless he has the impact of Ronaldo.

He'll go, just a matter of time.
 
bluechampion7891 said:
I'm no cynic said:
ColinLee said:
18 isn't it? Or have I missed someone? Richards & Sinclair are missing as I'm presuming they're history. Still too many of course.

1. Caballero
2. Zabaleta
3. Sagna
4. Kolarov
5. Demichelis
6. Kompany
7. Mangala(?)
8. Fernando
9. Garcia
10. Fernandinho
11. Nasri
12. Silva
13. Yaya
14. Navas
15. Jovetic
16. Aguero
17. Dzeko
18. Negredo

19. Hart HG
20. Wright HG
21. Clichy HG
22. Milner HG
23. Rodwell HG
24. Boyata CT
18 it is. Don't know where I got the extra man from, but the argument still holds good if we signed up Isco or A.N Other. Two of our existing overseas lads will have to be released, and make it three for CL purposes. Garcia would be the most likely omission, but who would the others be and would they be happy about it?

I think they count Zuculini
If he was staying (rather than go on loan) then for the CL he would count since he's not been here for the necessary 2 years, however the PL I think drop that requirement so for this year only he would count as an U21.
 
richball_PF55 said:
Dribble said:
Falastur said:
http://hereisthecity.com/en-gb/2014/07/21/rumoured-man-city-and-liverpool-target-not-interested-in-move-to/?
Real are a strange club where being a good footballer isn‘t enough. Michael Owen & Mesut Ozil found this to their cost.

If Madrid see James as a better looking and better player who'll not just contribute on the pitch, but also with selling shirts and the brand, Real have a track record of jettisoning the incumbent without so much as a cursory glance over their shoulder.

For Isco, see Ozil.

Ozil was a regular first team starter for Madrid though? Silly comparison.

Not really it's a good point Madrid are always looking at the next level Ozil fitted the bill at one time, but it was apparent when he comes off 30 mins at the end of each game that they were looking for a move on
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top