JoeMercer'sWay said:
it is a poisoned chalice on here. Israel you seem to be implying is used on here as a cover to what people actually mean to be Jews, but say Israel so as to not get themselves into trouble?
I, for one, do not defend what the Catholic Church has done(though it's collusion with the Nazi party is debatable as The Nazis actively destroyed the CC in Germany and The Pope was publically against their actions), however a question does strike me. As many European Jews had to go to Israel instead of integrate back into Europe, it begs a question why do they need their own state which they didn't have in the first place?
It is quite possible to criticise Israel without being anti-semitic. Most that do almost certainly aren't
. But that fails to recognise that some people use anti-Israeli sentiment as a cloak for anti-semitism as well as the fact that racism generally (and anti-semitism in particular) is deeply ingrained into British culture, particularly the ruling classes. Neville Chamberlain was anti-semitic. Macmillan made his famous remark about Thatcher's cabinet being more Old Estonian than Old Etonian. Someone described him as being anti-semitic without ever really knowing why.
As to your second point about why the Jews couldn't re-integrate into Europe, it depends on where you came from. Many Western Eurpoean Jews did go back to places like France, Holland & Belgium. But those in Eastern Europe still faced persecution and prejudice, with many being killed in Poland even after the war ended. So how could they integrate?
Plus, a large part of Israel's population soon after independence came from the Middle East and North Africa, when they were forcibly expelled from countires they'd lived in happily for centuries.