Vester
Well-Known Member
Would be a decent replacement if Raheem indeed decides he wants to leave. But I would still see it as a downgrade and much prefer that Sterling stays.
It's ok Raheem, move on, your contributions to the club will never be forgotten. Now let's bring in Leao as his replacement and destroy the league/Efl/FA/UCL. Let's destroy football!
To counter balance that view, Transfermarkt want to be a plausible website and will try to keep values realistic and change outlandish ones that football fans have jokingly added.Since when was transfermarkt an authority on player's values? It's a site edited by football fans, thus I could go on there and say Kev's current value is £40mil; which is obviously ludicrous. Transfermarkt doesn't dictate the value of players.
This is true, but they are still just a third party, aggregator site. City, as a world class business and organisation, should not be valuing an asset like Bernardo Silva at €80mil. Given his worth to the team and current market dynamics, we're talking at least £100mil.To counter balance that view, Transfermarkt want to be a plausible website and will try to keep values realistic and change outlandish ones that football fans have jokingly added.
True market value is only known by the clubs involved.
If Barca value him at €80m, they will bid up to that, should their finances allow.
If City value him at £100m, they will reject those offers.
what favors have we done barca? Sell them ferran for an inflated price?Omg. Barcelona being done favours!
Citeh, the gift that keeps on giving!
True, but all clubs value at least some of their players above their market value to dismiss transfer rumours.This is true, but they are still just a third party, aggregator site. City, as a world class business and organisation, should not be valuing an asset like Bernardo Silva at €80mil. Given his worth to the team and current market dynamics, we're talking at least £100mil.
It's immaterial, because I don't believe the €80mil valuation to be legitimate.