You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet 17 - Glory Thread
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
I cant find anything official onlineView attachment 42818
Was the contract extension ever confirmed in public?
Maybe it wasn’t…. Shhhh don’t tell kloppI cant find anything official online
We don’t need Puma to pay for him, the Sheikh will just get another of his companies to over pay to be our official vermicelli partner to finance the deal, like he’s done since 2008.
Or maybe we just use the Torres money.
It was a piss take mate, at all the criticism thrown your way for having the audacity to sign one of the worlds best young players for a cheap deal. See the Telegraph deciced to run with the overall figure of the deal including wages etc- never seen that before.
samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 5,493
- Team supported
- Manchester City
the transfer forums feels small without the haaland thread
Thaksinssoldier
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 10,107
View attachment 42818
Was the contract extension ever confirmed in public?
That’s clearly bullshit, has him listed as 18. He’s 17.
MadeOfStones
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jan 2021
- Messages
- 396
- Team supported
- Man City
Yup it feels a bit empty nowthe transfer forums feels small without the haaland thread
Yeah because clubs always give out massive contracts to players they don't use for 4 months at a time.
They're both in identical situations, rejecting contracts for their own career flexibility, only one of them gets abuse for it.
They are not the same situations though, at least as far as we know.
We don't know what Jesus is being offered, if anything. And both his initial fee and the wages package so far are far less so it is less of a return to protect.
Saying that, I agree with you entirely, no need to single out Sterling for refusing a contract at all. But I fully see why people would rather he was sold rather than Jesus.
Sorry but I have never seen anything related to Sterling and Pep having any sort of tension between them.
You kidding?
We don't know what Jesus is being offered, if anything. And both his initial fee and the wages package so far are far less so it is less of a return to protect.
The difference in intial fee is a weird thing to bring up. £44m 7 years ago (£6.2m/year) vs. Jesus' £28m 5 years ago (£5.6m/year)...no one gives a shit about that.
We know Jesus wants £240k/week from Arsenal, I doubt he's demanding less from City.