Probably designed to unsettle Cucurella and start making noises to Brighton about getting a move on
Via Bild? would question that.
Probably designed to unsettle Cucurella and start making noises to Brighton about getting a move on
Funnily, I tried to get Sam Lee to do a story on these accounts and the rise of them a few months back. He pointed out that the allegations I had that they were making it up and charging fools money to believe in them is basically what most people think the foundation of journalism has been for about the last two decades
I think if he had said that it would be over and at least we would know that Brighton really wanted to keep their player.True to a point but maybe they have told us £70m for Cucurella?
Hope we don’t take that risk. I feel there maybe a surprise signing being planned - we do things very quietly nowadaysMaybe, maybe not. After a total 4 cameo appearances in the league, I doubt there is that much more experience. Either way, he was still here last season so can't really treat him as a new additional
player.
Again, purely a comment on numbers and squad size, not on the quality. We need to accept that if we are going with a LB replacing Zinchenko and that's it, then we are going with a smaller squad, that's all.
If they,d of signed Ake, that might of tipped me over the edge :-)I’ve just ordered my half & half scarf just in case
Really? Have a look at your posts again and if you cannot see your posting negative outcomes, then there is nothing else to sayExplain? Wishing your club has more players available is everything but a 'loser mentality'.
Nice language. You kiss your mother with that mouth?
Nah, time to flip is when they sign a few superstars :-)Chelsea is soooo 2005, it’s Newcastle these days.
Keep yourself updated…
Yeah I view no news as good news in this saga. We would have moved on by now if we didn't think a deal could be struck.I think if he had said that it would be over and at least we would know that Brighton really wanted to keep their player.