OB1
Well-Known Member
I'll repeat on Lampard. He's been sacked by two clubs that are basket cases and have gone through managers like Lewis Hamilton goes through corners.
I can see the benefits for Lampard but no idea what he brings to the party to benefit us. This move would annoy me to a significant degree.
If that would be his role, fine. I was responding to the idea of him as Assistant to Pep (including giving his input on tactics etc). I've never seen any indication he has much in the way of managerial intelligence in that way. One-on-one coaching with players to pass on his personal expertise as you describe it, not a problem. But as you say, that's what you "imagine" his role would be. Ofc we'll have to see if there's anything to him coming at all.I imagine he’d be here as a Coach, and would perform a similar role to Arteta and Marseca before him - coaching players on specific areas of their game based on his considerable experience and skill as a player. He’d also be another foil to Pep, alongside Borrell, Vicens, Planchart, Estiarte, etc.
What he wouldn’t be doing is setting our tactics and leading on how we counter the specific tactical threats of particular opponents and formations. That’s Pep’s job.
I remember Sterling, Jesus and others saying how much they learned and improved from Arteta’s coaching on body shape and striking the ball, becoming better goal scorers because of it.
That’s the kind of work I’d imagine he’d be tasked with - coaching not management.
I can’t see why Lampard in a role like that would annoy you to such a degree - but each to their own, I guess!
The longer this goes on…..