Difference being Sancho decided that before even playing for us.There is the similarity that they both decided they didn't want to work with Pep and asked for a move.
100%, hasn't hurt City in the slightestThere is the similarity that they both decided they didn't want to work with Pep and asked for a move.
He still didn’t refuse to play or travel like Sancho didYou make it sound like he was doing us a favour ‘turning out’ rather that doing his job and playing in cup final for the club who pay his wages. He should have been grateful for the start seeing as he was agitating for a move at the time..
There is the similarity that they both decided they didn't want to work with Pep and asked for a move.
Nail on headIt wasn’t the case they didn’t want to work with Pep.
Sancho didn’t get picked for the pre season tour and spat his dummy out. Decided he wanted to go and then just didn’t turn up for training. He hadn’t even played for City in one game at this point. No one is having a jumped up little prick like that near our club. He got sold because of his attitude, and there was never going to be any way back from that. Then he went Utd too, which sums him up.
Sane got courted by Bayern, being from Germany he fancied it, put a transfer request in, but he carried on playing. At least he actually did play for us too and was very successful.
The big difference though, Sancho is crap now, Sane is still decent.
That’s how you get famous on Twitter, for sure! ;)Why are so many on here so obsessed with transfer info coming from Twitter accounts? Unless your a teenager or a halfwit following and posting info from these accounts on here Is actually ridiculous. Just about anyone could set up an account and start copying and pasting transfer crap all day.