Zinchenko was a weak link for us and proving to be for Arsenal.
Sterling’s form has fall off a cliff but could we ever really rely on him in front of goal. Jesus is the biggest miss because of his work rate and ability to dribble and get round the back of the defence when playing wide.
Having said all that what a great deal we did getting Haaland and Alvarez for less than we got for Sterling and Jesus.
Zinchenko has been one of Arsenal's best players and they credit him with changing the entire dressing room spirit and making them title contenders.
Absolutely no one involved in Arsenal thinks he's a weak link just because of the equaliser last week.
But Pep doesn’t want an attacking fullback. If he did then Walker would be starting every game.Yeah, I think the only thing we really miss is an attacking fullback and a proper pacey winger both of which would be useful in some games and give us more tactical flexibility.
Nearly got me with that one!But Pep doesn’t want an attacking fullback. If he did then Walker would be starting every game.
posting news without any credence, how is that reliable???How is that a mistake? Aggregators have a job of just posting news as they see it. As an aggregator FOR City its kind of their job to relay reliable news related to City
Agree, and pretty sure Pep would like to have these options. But who could that be? The absence of any links to fullbacks/wingers baffles meYeah, I think the only thing we really miss is an attacking fullback and a proper pacey winger both of which would be useful in some games and give us more tactical flexibility.
If Pep wanted them then we would go and get them. I think its pretty clear that he doesn't.Agree, and pretty sure Pep would like to have these options. But who could that be? The absence of any links to fullbacks/wingers baffles me
Agree, and pretty sure Pep would like to have these options. But who could that be? The absence of any links to fullbacks/wingers baffles me
When a club signs a player, the cost of the transfer fee is spread the period of the contract signed by the player. Laporte and Cancelo have been here several years and signed contract extensions since also.
For example, We sign Laporte for £40 million on a five year contract on 1 January 2018. Sell Laporte for £26 million on 1 January 2020. At that date his accounting book value is £24 million (£40m – 2 years amortisation at £8m a year) so you can book a profit of £2m on the deal.
Laporte actually signed in 2018, so has been here 5 years already at an amortized cost of 13m a year. If we sell him for 30m, the books will show a 30m profit because hes fulfilled his original contract.
As an aggregator if a recognised source posts a link they are reliable in reporting that link. It doesn't mean the original source is reliable just that they have some recognition.posting news without any credence, how is that reliable???