blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,387
Doubt it.I wonder if he would be signed to play RB and still go for Bruno or Neves?
Doubt it.I wonder if he would be signed to play RB and still go for Bruno or Neves?
Possible all depends on what happens with Kova, Nunes and Phillips.I wonder if he would be signed to play RB and still go for Bruno or Neves?
Doubt it.
I still think this could be the case mateI wonder if he would be signed to play RB and still go for Bruno or Neves?
I still think this could be the case mate
Me too - trouble is we don’t have enough players Pep trusts.then i`m in mate ;-)
Can't see it, Kimmich plays either inverted right back, with Walker rotating,thenn plays as a 6 when Rodri doesn't. Wouldn't be surprised if we see Kovacic, and Bernardo sharing that 8, maybe even Rodri and Kimmich anchoring,and using somebody else wide right,possibly Savio, and Bernardo when we want more control.I still think we need a RB then (Frimpong?) Or leave Kimmich and get either Bruno or Neves.
I don’t think we’ll sign an out and out RB if Walker staysCan't see it, Kimmich plays either inverted right back, with Walker rotating,thenn plays as a 6 when Rodri doesn't. Wouldn't be surprised if we see Kovacic, and Bernardo sharing that 8, maybe even Rodri and Kimmich anchoring,and using somebody else wide right,possibly Savio, and Bernardo when we want more control.
No, that's why Kimmich makes a lot of sense. covers 2 positions, and minute wise if you add Phillips and Gomes together Kimmich covers that and still leaves plenty of minutes to rest Walker and Rodri. Any Savio minutes on that would be a bonus. Probably doesn't leave enough spare minutes for a Guimaraes or Neves, not at those prices.I don’t think we’ll sign an out and out RB if Walker stays