Maybe they've put bids in and it is the player that has rejected the Old Toilet shit show. Doesn't it change the narrative if the player only wants us? Or are some City fans still stuck with a negative outlook?Italian side has lots of report about rags putting bid for Ederson in the past 2 weeks and were rejected.
So I guess if we want him we have to be somewhere near a bid (or a bid is already made).
It’s obviously not a confirmation that either will sign, but the interest is more or less 100% genuine. There was a club briefing last week that Bruno G and Zubimendi were off the table for January, but for Marmoush and Ederson it’s a bit of the opposite. It’s an indication that the club thinks there’s a possibility for January, unlike with Bruno/Zubimendi. Deals in January are generally harder and both Frankfurt and Atalanta are doing very well in their respective domestic leagues, and would consequently ask for premiums, which makes negotiations harder. I have no doubt that the interest is genuine though when it comes from Gaughan and Blackburn
Getting Marmoush would be a bigger hurdle than getting Ederson. Atalanta can figure out a solution for their midfield without him.
Frankfurt would need to find a replacement that is fitting for them. Maybe they’ll take Kolo Muani back who knows
Long as we get a DM and this cover CB we can still be fine, one of Foden or Bobb as false 9 for rest of season can’t do much worse.Khusanov looks likely, not sure on the other two, dont see either moving for the price the article puts them at but we'll see.
But if, say, dippers were offering that money would you believe that they would get him? I'm guessing you would and it would be another example of City negativity.Khusanov looks likely, not sure on the other two, dont see either moving for the price the article puts them at but we'll see.