Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 30,477
I think he can read just fine, it's you who can't count.....Can you not read? Not a few million, They were offering over £10m.
That's 20x what we put down for Sancho.
I think he can read just fine, it's you who can't count.....Can you not read? Not a few million, They were offering over £10m.
That's 20x what we put down for Sancho.
Are the rags in for Mbappe Tolm?That won't happen, too much money to be made from clubs on the continent for selling us their best players!!
I think Aguero is much more aligned with what Madrid's MO is, in terms of his present profile, established record and look.
City have a long way to go before we can sit back and wait for things to mature. Madrid could happily spend £80m this summer on Sergio and even if we spend that or more on Mbappe, he's effectively cost us peanuts.
He's 18, in five years time he's prime time and City's risk/reward ratio could be two or three more Premier League titles and a Champions League trophy.
That's worth the risk to us and the wait for Madrid, who know Sergio can score for next three or four years for them.
United can piss and whinge over what might have been if Ronaldo had stayed at Old Toilet.
The record books, however, show what they did win during Tranny's time - certainly not chopped liver .
Sergio is a legend in my eyes and I would be gutted to see him go, but we don't want to make the same mistake we did with Yaya, not getting money for him two years ago.
It would not surprise me if City and Madrid have an "understanding" on Sergio and Mbappe.
Not hugely, but I definitely do lay a bit of blame at Pep's door for it, and have said so numerous times in here.In an ideal world where upsetting the dressing room and balancing the books isnt a factor,maybe.
I'm don't think the blame can lie at Pep's door for that scenario.
You cant just make four players disappear,who would all be earning approx 100k a week,3 of which still had a 12 months contract and another with 24.Not hugely, but I definitely do lay a bit of blame at Pep's door for it, and have said so numerous times in here.
It was a horrific decision to not strengthen the fullbacks last summer, and it wouldn't have cost a fortune to sort.
Hahahah i def meant RomeroRamos is a multi talented player I heard, both good in defense and attack, and now backup keeping apparently. ;)
Jesus was £27 million plus add ons.
Sane was £43.8 million plus add ons.
Regardless, I get your point about pressure on the player and expectations that come with a world record fee (see: Paul Pogshit) The OP I was responding to wasn't arguing about that though, they suggested another year in Monaco for Mbappe, performing as he has this year, would justify the spend. I do believe it's quite likely that he will opt for another season there, and Monaco (who stand to lose a good proportion of their successful squad) would paint this as a victory, but ultimately his talent has been established and he has set his market value through his performances.
Is he worth a world record fee? Some clubs believe so. Perhaps City do too.
Sane was €37m rising to €46.5m.
I personally was very impressed by BillyShears' suggestion that this situation with contracts was carefully planned to get the team ready for total clearout.You cant just make four players disappear,who would all be earning approx 100k a week,3 of which still had a 12 months contract and another with 24.
Unfortunately,we allowed ourselves to end up in a position where the players hold the cards.
Kolasinic is rumored to be signing pre contract agreement with arsenal. Why arent we interested? Or are we?Nothing new
Who said anything about getting rid of all 4? Stop building the straw man, lol.You cant just make four players disappear,who would all be earning approx 100k a week,3 of which still had a 12 months contract and another with 24.
Unfortunately,we allowed ourselves to end up in a position where the players hold the cards.