40m payout is probably nothing for the service he's done them tbf.
True, but 40 mil Barca have to pay him when they are debt ridden thats A transfer for them
40m payout is probably nothing for the service he's done them tbf.
Maybe, but the player is taking a risk, especially in today's market, as their preferred teams may not be as desirable now as a couple of years ago.Thats all any club can do, as its NOT a clubs decision to sell or not .....ultimately up to the player, we could hypothetically offer PSG £1 billion for Mbappe tomorrow, they inform him and he says "dont think so" ....end of, he waits and goes where he wants at end of contract.
I think this transfer window could be the one where we redefine how transfer windows work in the future. Traditionally it's been a club wants a player and a fee is agreed between the three parties and the transfer takes place most of the time, but this season money in the richest leagues is confined to a small group of teams that doesn't include the two traditional European "super" clubs and they need players and a money injection. Khaldoon said in his interview that swap deals would play apart in transfers and he is probably right, a weak and poor Real and Barca is fantastic from rival fans point of view, for the shits and the giggles, but from City's view not so good, we need a strong Barca or Real to ensure that WE ALL make money, if there is no competition then where's the product? Where's the money to be made ? This season sees a situation where some of the world's influential players mature and future prospects could be available, we are in a strong position financially but we are also strong in player assets as well. If we genuinely want to be seen as a giant of the world game then we may have to shake things up a bit, to get a Messi who would propel us to a higher level of global awareness, then maybe we need to take a hit on a Laporte or a B Silva to Barca or Real ? Give a bit to get a bit ? I think Khaldoon and co are 3 steps ahead of any other clubs management in the world at this moment and they see that the traditional way of doing transfers may not be the future way of doing transfers .
A free agent whom would probably want 400-500k week, even for us that nonsense moneyPlayer swaps won’t work our assets are undervalued by other clubs and our own fans and any replacements are over valued by rival clubs
And no way we sell at reduced price or give away players to Barcelona to get a player who is a free agent
True, but 40 mil Barca have to pay him when they are debt ridden thats A transfer for them
I’m certain we would if we thought he’d come.Mbappe rejected us once doubt we go for him again
but just how much does that agent make out of it might be crux of it
There is if you need the full backs or the centre backs.Best to buy whay you think you need to make the whole team better, not blow it on one position You win more that way, as we have.The fee bugs me , we collect 50-60 million pound players like that’s a average cost to pay out. Why not just spend £100 for Halland or whatever it takes , no difference to buying 4 full backs for £50 million or 4 £50 million centre backs.
They will probably get more for Abraham than what they shell out for Haaland.Chelsea will easily make the money for Haaland transfer just by selling players at high fees they do not even need. They have a huge loan army they do not need and can rake in great fees for them.
I am 100% sure they could get more for Tammy Abraham than Txiki for Jesus in transfer fee.
Yeah we needed full backs and centre backs but the club think having 10-12 players who cost £60 million is ok but having one who costs £100 million isn’tThere is if you need the full backs or the centre backs.Best to buy whay you think you need to make the whole team better, not blow it on one position You win more that way, as we have.
Every window is different, we only really need one player this window so we might blow it on one, or we might not.