Because you don’t cut your nose off to spite your own face
but why not ? better fish in the sea in haaland
let kane play for spurs for the next 5 years and fuck them
Because you don’t cut your nose off to spite your own face
Don’ think Bernardo has been better than Grealish the last two years, anyway looks like Bernardo is going so Grealish will replace him, and would be an excellent replacement personally the cost has no relevance to me.even the question of £100milion for a player that not played european football or top level football week in week out is crazy ? you know what B.silva is better than jack grealish so maybe we just say no
But what if certain fish don’t like the bait we usebut why not ? better fish in the sea in haaland
let kane play for spurs for the next 5 years and fuck them
Are you seriously suggesting we don’t buy players from the top half of the Premier League anymore or are you going to be honest and say that this bullshit reason is just because you don’t want Grealish?
Don’ think Bernardo has been better than Grealish the last two years, anyway looks like Bernardo is going so Grealish will replace him, and would be an excellent replacement personally the cost has no relevance to me.
And what if we have? We obviously want the players, Pep has gone on about him previously about how good he is, Villa have a right to put a level under which they won’t sell… if it’s £100 million to secure him then fair play to Villa for standing firm, fair play to City for stumping up the money.
It’s amazing on here, previous times we’ve won the league, not advanced the squad and been accused of tight because we wont match other teams spending and you’d think the world had ended, next we’re being linked to class, and more importantly, proven players and people are going batshit crazy because they will cost a sack load of money… it’s almost like people don’t want the club to do either unless they have the absolute approval of someone that’s once won a couple of leagues on champ manager in the late 90’s
But what if certain fish don’t like the bait we use
if it was for a player already done it won titles/cups played champions league football then yes
BUT Grealish is not the finish article and will need time and dare i say pressure of the price tag
its a gamble and not what manchester city normally do in paying over the odds for a untested player
£100 million is a heavy stone to carry on a young man shoulders
Not all the fish seem to like it thoughthe bait we use is quality and the best in football
Bullshit. We paid big fees for Ederson, Walker, De Bruyne, Agüero, Dias…if it was for a player already done it won titles/cups played champions league football then yes
BUT Grealish is not the finish article and will need time and dare i say pressure of the price tag
its a gamble and not what manchester city normally do in paying over the odds for a untested player
£100 million is a heavy stone to carry on a young man shoulders