daztrueblue91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 4,062
Clutching at straws. We were very much in for him but got gazumped by utd.
However i agree with your second point. They didnt need him and overpaid again so City didnt get him.
They care more about getting one over City than they do having a coherent transfer policy.
(Not that we had one this summer either)
I agree that stopping him from coming to City may have been a reason why United signed him. However, I disagree that they don’t need him.
He’s better than what they currently have and signing players who improve the starting 11 is how sides improve.
If United didn’t need Ronaldo, then did we really need Ake, Cancelo, Rodri, Mahrez and Grealish?