Ivan Toney

LangleyBlue1970 said:
They’ll be a threat with him. Exactly what is missing from their team.
Click to expand...
Not a title threat until they start benching Enzo or Caicedo. They just don't work well together. Toney is not a big enough upgrade on Jackson to be a difference imo.

I'd be playing Caicedo and Lavia holding with Palmer in the 10/RCM. Nkunku playing off Toney with Neto and one of the other 100 wingers on the other side. Embarrassment of riches at Chelsea right now. Not sure how they'll get away with this.
 
BringBackSwales said:
How the fuck can chelsea keep doing this and being ok with premier league psr requirements? We so much as fart and it’s 116
Click to expand...

They're sailing on the very edge, but the plan is to clear out all the older players on high salaries and the "pure profit" Academy products, and to replace them with young players on lower salaries, and longer amortised contracts.

Last Summer, they sold or let go of, Havertz, Mount, Koulibaly, Kovacic, Pulisic, Mendy, Loftus-Cheek, Ampadu, Hudson-Odoi, Kante, Aubameyang, Azpilicueta, Babayoko etc., and loaned Ziyech, Kepa, Lukaku. That's a hell of a boost to their finances.

It's not quite the same, but similar to when City had that big spending splurge after Pep's first season. We didn't make huge amounts in fees, but got around a dozen ageing, big earners off the books, and spent the money on half that many younger players. Net spend looked poor, but overall it wasn't a huge change in the overall finances.
 
bluenova said:
They're sailing on the very edge, but the plan is to clear out all the older players on high salaries and the "pure profit" Academy products, and to replace them with young players on lower salaries, and longer amortised contracts.

Last Summer, they sold or let go of, Havertz, Mount, Koulibaly, Kovacic, Pulisic, Mendy, Loftus-Cheek, Ampadu, Hudson-Odoi, Kante, Aubameyang, Azpilicueta, Babayoko etc., and loaned Ziyech, Kepa, Lukaku. That's a hell of a boost to their finances.

It's not quite the same, but similar to when City had that big spending splurge after Pep's first season. We didn't make huge amounts in fees, but got around a dozen ageing, big earners off the books, and spent the money on half that many younger players. Net spend looked poor, but overall it wasn't a huge change in the overall finances.
Click to expand...
And our strategy at the time has seemed to work out reasonably well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.