You're being obtuse - I'm paying your club a backhanded compliment. The fee will be over £100 million and no one else in the league can afford that. No need to be so weirdly sensitive about a fact.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Jack Grealish
- Thread starter leighton
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Tbh I suspect that with Grealish, Kane, or anybody really that's obviously super talented that any opposition is mostly just emotional intuition than anything. Then all the reasons such as diving or whatever are just means to justify that feeling.If your reasoning for Grealish not joining is because he cheats then you are throwing stones from a glass house.
Also, poor John Stones...
Well we can be fairly sure he isn't going for what he would have cost last summer as that would be stupid.You can piss and wind all you like but none of us have any idea and that’s the bottom line.
No, but Silva could definitely play on fouls when he wanted to. Could get quite vocal/insistent when he needed to, because he was laying the foundation for the next time....Maybe in the same vein, but Grealish statistically wins more fouls per game than almost everyone, and Silva certainly didn't.
All I'm saying is that what players at the peak of the game do now. Whether we like it or not.
Petetheblu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2007
- Messages
- 7,337
Fook me Fants, you couldn't wait to talk about the Glazers could you.....Bloody rag..... :^)If your reasoning for Grealish not joining is because he cheats then you are throwing stones from a glass house.
Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 17,067
You're being obtuse - I'm paying your club a backhanded compliment. The fee will be over £100 million and no one else in the league can afford that. No need to be so weirdly sensitive about a fact.
ofcourse they could. I could see United and Chelsea spending 100m easily. Might be wrong but wasn’t havertz 89m and pogba 90m? - not that far off
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
I also think some are incredibly blinkered.Tbh I suspect that with Grealish, Kane, or anybody really that's obviously super talented that any opposition is mostly just emotional intuition than anything. Then all the reasons such as diving or whatever are just means to justify that feeling.
Also, poor John Stones...
FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
Sorry for being a pane.Fook me Fants, you couldn't wait to talk about the Glazers could you.....Bloody rag..... :^)
TonyColemansbagofapples
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2017
- Messages
- 4,093
I know how the market works thank you. You have a price, City have a price. City will not go above our valuation. That is the stance of the clubs.He is to Villa. If he isn't worth the same to Man City as he is to us then he stays. Very simple. That's how the transfer market works I think.
For a player it is different. Either he wants to win things or he doesn't. Which category is Jack in? If he wants to win things he leaves Villa behind. Simples.
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
And united have just done so for the fourth time. But that doesn’t fit the ‘spendthrift oil **** Arabs’ narrative prevalent among the hard of thinkingUnited, Chelsea, Liverpool and Arsenal have all paid more for a single player than we have so stop being silly
- Status
- Not open for further replies.