I suspect all they are doing is trying to appease their fans but deep down £100M or whatever will enable them to strengthen their team far more considerably than just relying on one player, who I admit can be a game changer.I don’t understand this, AV don’t want too sell Grealish so why don’t they just say no? He’s under contract. Not for sale at any price. Instead they have offerd him an improvement on a contract he’s only just signed? To try and entice him too stay. Surely they would just say no, he’s invaluable to us please piss off. Unless A) he has release clause or b) he wants to leave but even then AV could refuse that request.
There has too be a release clause no?
If Villa and City are in talks then it implies their must be one, either that or Villa are happy to sell? I've been wondering about this all along.Does he have a release clause in his contract? I read he had an £88m one.
Booked in with the Samaritans.Where have all the Villa posters gone ?
Just reading between the lines I have thought this for a while. And we aren’t such cheap cunts as Arsenal when they offered £1 more for Suarez.No it’s a good call mate ...I don’t think anyone will ever know the full price for transfers like this ..but dare I say if it does go through it makes it easier for Spurs to sell Kane to us.
without the fall out. Levy can smell a wallet open for miles .
HahahahahahahahaAP McCoy was riding that posh cycling bird Vicky Pendleton who trained at the Velodrome over the road and tried to make it as a jockey so who knows. Maybe he had some inside shizz from Beswick ;)
Im convinced the clause is ‘a British record fee’ so £90m, however it is structured. Though that is based on fuck all but guesswork so feel free to ignore