Jack Grealish

[crazyg]

Mattyb reckons 19.

A good number to have. It was Colin Bell's number in the Mexico World Cup,1970.
He's got a lot to live up to.

 

[malg]

Grealish for 100m is absolutely and utterly ridiculous - especially in this economic climate and transfer market.

Economic climate. What's that got to do with anything??

 

[wolviedinho]

Finished it off for you

Excellent so 100 is a bargain ;)

 

[vuoso1993]

Summer feelings again

 

[Ian]

being presented as in the stadium or what? thought he could be available for saturday ngl

No more details mate.

 

[Kippax77]

We will be even stronger with Jack Grealish, surely this is a plus

 

[Mike N]

No one is worth £100m. It’s ridiculous. Who cares? The game “went” years before we could afford to buy some of the crap we did 20 years ago.
the only people bothered about the cost of players are sad farts who like to bleat about “net spend”.
It makes no difference if we pay £10m or £100m for a player.

I agree completely. Having said that I’m still disgusted at the millions, was it £10M, that Frank Clark wasted!

 

[wolviedinho]

Wouldn’t it be funny if we do spend over £200m and Peps first press conference the media demand answers as to how with FFP and Pep staying unequivocally that it was not possible.

Only for him to answer the following:” SM found us a new totally unrelated business partner from Abu Dhabi2 called sheikh mansour shoes…unbelievable ;)

 

[ManCitizens.]

Which fees from 30yrs ago equate to £100M today?

View attachment 22809

That would mean TODAY’S record, based on Andy Gray’s record fee of £1,500,000 in 1981 would be about £6.5M.

Are you talking about some other kind of inflation, maybe in another country?!

I’m talking about in football. Paul Ince and Gary Pallister cost a higher % of Utds turnover in 1989 than Grealish for 100m and Kane for 150m would cost ours this year

 

[melrose40yarder]

Saw that ,what a lemon

It really is about time City stopped interacting with some of the shithouse media.