richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 31,829
He’s brilliant grealish but we honestly don’t need him do we? Unless a big name is going?
Maybe Pep expects a departureHe’s brilliant grealish but we honestly don’t need him do we? Unless a big name is going?
Maybe Pep expects a departure
I posted this in TH’s summer transfer thread and some naysayers still kept banging on about how bad they thought Grealish isI came across this at end of last season.
I posted this in TH’s summer transfer thread and some naysayers still kept banging on about how bad they thought Grealish is
I don’t think he’s expensive at allWe don’t need this stroppy little scrote good player that he is.
Far too expensive.
Let the rags re-mortgage themselves to sign him I say.
Grealish will become our Totti...
Out of interest what do you think he'd cost and what would be 'far too expensive' in your eyes?We don’t need this stroppy little scrote good player that he is.
Far too expensive.
Let the rags re-mortgage themselves to sign him I say.
Got to be Wilfred.Good debate to be had actually, who was the last genuinely 'shit' player we had on the books? I'd probably go for Tal Ben Haim although I have to admit I'm a bit fuzzy on dates.
He was fucking great at Monaco and up until his knee injury here.
Depends who you believe; anywhere between £80-100 million quoted in the press.Out of interest what do you think he'd cost and what would be 'far too expensive' in your eyes?
He has a buy out clause.To describe him simply as a creative midfielder doesn't do him justice either.Depends who you believe; anywhere between £80-100 million quoted in the press.
That’s far too much in my view and we just don’t need another creative midfielder.
Would rather go balls deep for Haaland.
The buy out clause for us is under the 80 million which he described as “too expensive”. It’s said to be 60 million which is reasonableHe has a buy out clause.To describe him simply as a creative midfielder doesn't do him justice either.
Much like Haaland,he is in an elite pocket of players that can elevate us.
I don’t doubt he’s a very very good player but we’re well stocked in left sided attacking midfield players and I would question his character and judgement. He always seems to attract trouble off the pitch and the media would have a field day with his persistent misdemeanours if he played for us. We don’t need it.He has a buy out clause.To describe him simply as a creative midfielder doesn't do him justice either.
Much like Haaland,he is in an elite pocket of players that can elevate us.
YepThe buy out clause for us is under the 80 million which he described as “too expensive”. It’s said to be 60 million which is reasonable
Oh please. Is he any worse off the pitch than Walker or done anything worse than Phil in Iceland? And both are okayHe always seems to attract trouble off the pitch and the media would have a field day with his persistent misdemeanours if he played for us. We don’t need it.
Hes brilliant,better than what we have in the main.His character isn't an issue according to far more knowledgeable people than myself.I don’t doubt he’s a very very good player but we’re well stocked in left sided attacking midfield players and I would question his character and judgement. He always seems to attract trouble off the pitch and the media would have a field day with his persistent misdemeanours if he played for us. We don’t need it.
Apart from that the money can be spent much better elsewhere.
Just my opinion.
Getting away from Birmingham where he will inevitably attract the worst sort of parasites and hangers-on could do him the world of goodHes brilliant,better than what we have in the main.His character isn't an issue according to far more knowledgeable people than myself.
We have money for elsewhere