Jack Grealish

[RayCTID]

You’re quick with the Grealish hate lol!!

Bait?

 

[eastlandsblue]

He will be a bargain at 8 million or 20 million.

Times and values have changed significantly since those two. Grealish is definitely a 60m player. All the talk of 100m is plain daft

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

You’re quick with the Grealish hate lol!!!

Don't bother , he gets off on it.

 

[RayCTID]

Don't bother , he gets off on it.

Not on the wind up this this time. Grealish wouldn't of solved any of our problems against Leeds and would of had the same problems as Sterling (Sterling has the better goalscoring record despite his erratic finishing)

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Not on the wind up this this time. Grealish wouldn't of solved any of our problems against Leeds and would of had the same problems as Sterling (Sterling has the better goalscoring record despite his erratic finishing)

I actually agree with you.

Grealish doesn't score anywhere near the same number of goals as Sterling does.

 

[FantasyIreland]

I actually agree with you.

Grealish doesn't score anywhere near the same number of goals as Sterling does.

Goals don't define Grealish because he brings so much more in terms of overall play.His ability makes a team much more fluid and cohesive,whilst he thrills supporters.

A player you can rely on when the shit hits the fan,one who inspires and takes a game by the scruff.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Goals don't define Grealish because he brings so much more in terms of overall play.His ability makes a team much more fluid and cohesive,whilst he thrills supporters.

A player you can rely on when the shit hits the fan,one who inspires and takes a game by the scruff.

I know that , and I agree about his overall play. I only replied to the comparison which was used in reference to Sterling.

I think Grealish is talented and capable of doing well at City especially with Pep looking to educate him on certain aspects . If we are in for him I will look at it in a very positive light.

 

[RayCTID]

Sterling can be just as creative when on form. I don't see Grealish as an improvement on what we have currently got and would add and not solve problems.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Sterling can be just as creative.

Sterling can be lots of things which sadly isn't the case at the moment. Hoping his game hasn't gone off the edge of the cliff .

 

[Tokyo32]

Goals don't define Grealish because he brings so much more in terms of overall play.His ability makes a team much more fluid and cohesive,whilst he thrills supporters.

A player you can rely on when the shit hits the fan,one who inspires and takes a game by the scruff.

I agree that grealish is a better overall player “objectively” like he is more technical and doesn’t trip over the ball but as bad as sterling is he has an eye for goals which I am not sure grealish has.

Grealish is more about creating chances and taking players on rather than scoring. We need players that have goal on their mind first not dribbles though